medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Authors instructions        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 1

Rev Mex Urol 2010; 70 (1)

Usefulness of Fournier’s gangrene severity index: a comparative study

Gutiérrez-Ochoa J, Castillo-de Lira HH, Velázquez-Macías RF, Landa-Soler M, Robles-Scott MA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 27-30
PDF size: 288.70 Kb.


Key words:

Fournier’s gangrene, index, mortality, predictive value.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To demonstrate the usefulness of Fournier’s Gangrene Severity Index (FGSI) with mortality predictive value at the Lic. Adolfo López Mateos Regional Hospital.
Materials and methods: A retrospective study of case records from the years 2003-2008 of all patients identified with Fournier’s gangrene (FG) at the authors’ hospital was carried out. The list of patients diagnosed with FG was obtained from the hospital registers. FG was clinically diagnosed based on medical history and physical examination. Perianal, periurethral and scrotal abscesses were excluded from the analysis if there was no evidence of extension to soft tissues or necrosis. To calculate FGSI, 9 hospital admission parameters were evaluated: temperature, heart rate, respiratory rate, sodium, potassium, serum creatinine, serum bicarbonate, leukocyte count and hematocrit. Deviation from the norm was gauged from 0-4 as described by Laor et al. All statistical analysis was developed using SPSS 15 software.
Results: Four of the 33 evaluated male patients (mean age 65 years) died, representing 12.2% of the total. Those 4 patients had an FGSI score above 9 with a mean 13.5.
Conclusions: Fournier’s Gangrene Severity Index is simple and objective. The threshold of 9 is sensitive and specific as a mortality predictor in this type of population.


REFERENCES

  1. Fournier JA. Gangrene foudroyante de la verge. Semin Med 1883;3:345.

  2. Clayton MD, Fowler JE Jr, Sharifi R, Pearl RK. Causes, presentation and survival of fifty-seven patients with necrotizing fasciitis of the male genitalia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1990; 170:49

  3. Eke N. Fournier’s gangrene: a review of 1726 cases. Br J Surg 2000;87:718.

  4. Spirnak JP, Resnick MI, Hampel N, Persky L. Fournier’s gangrene: report of 20 patients. J Urol 1984;131:289.

  5. Laor E, Palmer LS, Tolia BM, Reid RE, Winter HI. Outcome prediction in patients with Fournier’s Gangrene J Urol 1995; 154: 89.

  6. Dahm P, Roland FH, Vaslef SN, Moon RE, Price DT, Georgiade GS, et al. Outcome analysis in patients with primary necrotizing fasciitis of the male genitalia. Urology 2000;56:31.

  7. Korkut M, Icoz G, Dayangac M, Akgun E, Yeniyay L, Erdogan O, et al. Outcome analysis in patients with Fournier’s gangrene: report of 45 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:649.

  8. Yeniyol CO, Suelozgen T, Arslan M, Ayder AR. Fournier’s gangrene: experience with 25 patients and use of Fournier’s gangrene severity index score. Urology 2004;64:218.

  9. Tuncel A, Aydin O, Tekdogan U, Nalcacioglu V, Capar Y,Atan A. Fournier’s gangrene: three years of experience with 20 patients and validity of the Fournier’s Gangrene Severity Index Score. Eur Urol 2006;50:838.

  10. Ersay A, Yilmaz G, Akgun Y, Celik Y. Factors affecting mortality of Fournier’s gangrene: review of 70 patients. ANZ J Surg 2007;77:43.

  11. Anthony J. Schaeffer. Infecciones urinarias: Gangrena de Fournier. Campbell´s Urology, 8th Edition.Editorial Panamericana, 2007: 641-643.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

CÓMO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2010;70