medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2010, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2010; 70 (3)

Hypospadias treatment; five-year clinical experience

Espinosa GB, Muñoz-Islas EI, Torres-Medina E
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 152-156
PDF size: 884.69 Kb.


Key words:

hypospadias, Mathieu, urethrocutaneous fistula, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Background: Hypospadias is the result of abnormal development of embryonic layers of the penis that is manifested by a urethral meatus proximal to its normal glanular position at any point on the penis, scrotum or perineum. Experience with this pathology that has been accumulated over a period of five years at the authors’ institution is presented here.
Methods: A cross-sectional study of hypospadias cases was carried out from January first 2004 to Decemberthirtieth 2008. Service programming log, case records and medical histories of all patients involved were reviewed. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the Barcat classification: 1) anterior hypospadias, 2) middle hypospadias and 3) posterior hypospadias.
Results: Data was collected from 219 cases and only 75 patients were included. Of these, anterior hypospadias was found in 51 (68%), middle hypospadias in 12 (16%) and posterior hypospadias in 12 (16%). The Mathieu technique was used in 28 of the anterior hypospadias (54.9%) and was the most frequently used method. Complications presented in 27 (36%) of the 75 cases, the most frequent of which was urethrocutaneous fistula that presented in 16 patients (21%).
Conclusions: Hypospadias repair continues to be a great challenge requiring extensive knowledge. Experience is the determining factor in selecting the most adequate technique to be used in the type of hypospadias to be treated.


REFERENCES

  1. Shukla AR, Patel RP, Canning DA. Hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am. 2004 Aug;31(3):445-60, viii.

  2. Pérez NF, Llinás LE. Manejo Hipospadias, Revista Colombiana de Urología. www.scu.org.com/revistas/agosto2004.

  3. Walsh P, Retik A, Vaughan D. Campbell Urología, Octava Edición. Tomo 3: 2489 – 2540.

  4. Alvarado GR, Uribe RD, Gallego GJ. Técnica de Mathieu para la corrección del hipospadias distal en niños, Cir Ciruj. 2001;69(3):118-22.

  5. McLorie G, Joyner B, Herz D. A prospective randomized clinical trial to evaluate methods of postoperative care of hypospadias. J Urol. 2001 May;165(5):1669-72.

  6. Chávez EG. Corrección completa de hipospadias grave con cuerda en un tiempo quirúrgico. Bol Col Méx Urol. 1992: IX:(3):173.

  7. Chávez EG. Plastia de uretra con injerto de mucosa oral. Rev Méx Urol.1995;55(4): 57-9.

  8. Chávez EG. Plastia de uretra con injerto de mucosa oral. Rev Méx Urol. 2005; 65 (4): 221-225.

  9. Chávez EG. Reconstrucción de uretra con injerto de mucosa vesical. Rev. Méx. Urol. 1997;(2):44-47.

  10. Retik A, Keating M, Mandell J. Complications of hypospadias repair. Urol Clin North Am. 1988 May;15(2):223-36




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2010;70