Cedillo VJJ, Lugo FJA

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 185-191
PDF size: 899.87 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Restoration techniques have been evolving, whether it be in the placement of metals or the filling of cavities using low shrinkage and nanofill composites. The problem we currently find in the latter two is that they are very complex restoration techniques, given all of the factors that need to be taken into account in order to achieve an adequate restoration, one which is first and foremost long-lasting, and one that does not compromise the health of the tooth. Nowadays, composite materials are inert and, based on our clinical experience, we need materials that not only replace lost tissue, but which are also bioactive; which help us to remineralize the adjacent structures and reactivate the release of fluoride. In accordance with minimally invasive dentistry, and thanks to their esthetic value, resistance and high fluoride release, we have witnessed the resurgence of glass ionomer cements as yet another option for restoration treatment. A new filling material exists that is set to transform the current techniques used in posterior restorations. In this article we will describe a new method that differs from those we are already familiar with, one which uses only glass ionomer cement as the obturation material.

REFERENCES

1. Frencken JE, Pilot T, Songpaisan Y, Phantumvanit P, Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART): rationale, technique, and development. J Public Health Dent. 1996; 56(3 Spec No): 135-40.

2. Frencken JE, Holmgren C. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment for dental caries. Nijmegen, STI book b. v., 1999.

3. Navarro MFL, Pascotto RC. Cimentos de Ionômero de Vidro. São Paulo, Artes Médicas, 1998.

4. Annette Wiegand, Wolfgang Buchalla, Thomas Attin: Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials-Fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Academy of Dental Materials 2007; 23 (3): 343-362.

5. Dunne SM, Goolnik JS, Millar BJ: Caries inhibition by a resin modified and conventional glass ionomer cement in vitro. Journal of Dentistry 1996, 24(1–2):91-94.

6. Featherstone JDB: Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999, 27:31-40.

7. Forsten F: Fluoride release and uptake by glass-ionomers. Scand J Dent Res 1991, 99:241-245.

8. Francci C, Deaton TG, Arnold RR, Swift EJ, Perdigao J, Bewden JW, et al.: Fluoride release from restorative materials and its effect on dentin demineralization. J Dent Res 1999, 78:1647-54.

9. Perrin C, Persin M, Sarrazin J: A comparison of fluoride release from four glass ionomer cements. Quintessence Int 1999, 25(9):603-8.

10. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G: Fluoride uptake and release from a glass-ionomer. Swed Dent J 1991, 15:253-258.

11. Sennou HE, Lebugle AA, GreÂgoire GL. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of the dentin-glass ionomer cement interface. Dent Mater 1999;15:229:37.

12. Hewlett ER, Caputo AA, Wrobet DC. Glass ionomer bond strength and treatment of dentin with polyacrylic acid. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:767:72.

13. Burke F, Lynch E. Chemomechanical caries removal. The effect of chemomechanical caries removal on the bond strength of glass polyalkenoate cement to dentine. Journal of Dentistry 1994;22:283:91.

14. Smith DC, Ruse DN, Zuccolin D. Some characteristics of glass ionómer cement lining materials. J Can Dent Assoc 1988;54:903:8.

15. Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. Journal of Dentistry 1989;17:61:67.

16. Gordon J. Christensen: Glazing Resins: are they important and how do they differ? Clinicians Report 2008;1:1-2.

17. K. Kato, H Yarimizu, H. Nakaseko and T. Sakuma: Influence of coating materials on conventional glass-ionomer cement. Abstract 487 – IADR 2008, Toronto Canada.

18. T. Koch, B. Zimmerli, S. Flury and A. Lussi: The performance of composite finishing with different surface sealants. Abstract 307 – EADR 2009, München, Germany.

19. K. Kato, T. Noguchi, H. Nakaseko, S. Akahane: The influence of coating for the maturation of glass-ionomer cement. Abstract 2076 – IADR 2008, Toronto, Canada.

20. García Barbero J. Problemas de las resinas compuestas. Patología y Terapéutica Dental de J. García Barbero. Madrid, España, Ed. Síntesis. p: 436-49. 1997.

21. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration to restoration. J Dent Res 1987; 66 (11):1636-9.

22. Satoshi Inoue, Bart Van Meerbeek, Yasuhiko Abe, Yasuhiro Yoshida, Paul Lambrechts, Guido Vanherle, Hidehiko Sano: Effect of remaining dentin thickness and the use of conditioner on micro-tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive. Academy of Dental Materials 2001;17 (5): 445-455.