medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 1

Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2011; 71 (1)

Comparación de efectividad entre dos técnicas de anestesia local para biopsia transrectal de próstata guiada por ultrasonido: inyección simple apical e inyección basal bilateral

Robles-Scott MA, Venegas-Ocampo PJ, Castillo-de Lira HH, Gutiérrez-Ochoa J, Landa-Soler M
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 24
Page: 1-6
PDF size: 139.87 Kb.


Key words:

Transrectal biopsy of the prostate, simple apical block, bilateral basal block, transrectal ultrasound, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To demonstrate that simple apical injection is more effective in achieving anesthesia compared with bilateral basal technique in ultrasound-guided transrectal biopsy of the prostate.
Methods: The present study included sixty patients having undergone ultrasound-guided transrectal biopsy of the prostate in the time frame of February 1st to May 30th, 2009. Patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group A (n = 24) underwent biopsy after receiving simple apical block using 5 mL of lidocaine at 2% (single application) and Group B (n = 27) after receiving bilateral basal block using 10 mL of lidocaine at 2% (bilateral application). Pain was compared at transducer insertion, anesthetic application, and when biopsy samples were taken.
Results: Both techniques were effective in reducing pain at the moment of prostate biopsy. Mean pain at transducer insertion was 2.29 + 0.85 in Group A and 2.33 + 0.87 Group B, mean pain at anesthetic application was 1.67 + 0.63 in Group A and 1.89 + 0.69 in Group B, and mean pain at sample collection was 1.71 + 0.62 in Group A and 2.07 + 1.03 in Group B.
Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference between the two techniques. However, simple apical block technique was more effective as an anesthetic for carrying out ultrasound-guided transrectal biopsy of the prostate.


REFERENCES

  1. Soloway MS. Do unto others why I would want anesthesia for my prostate biopsy? Urology 2003;62:973-5.

  2. Andriole GL, Bullock TL, Belani JS. Is there a better way to biopsy the prostate? Prospects for a novel transrectal systematic biopsy approach. Urology 2007;70(6 Suppl):22-6.

  3. Hergan L, Kashefi C, Parsons JK. Local anesthetic reduces pain associated with transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a metaanalysis. Urology 2007;69:520-5.

  4. Richman JM, Carter HB, Hanna MN. Efficacy of periprostatic local anesthesic for prostate biopsy analgesia: a meta-analysis. Urology 2006;67:1224-8.

  5. Aronowitz J, Follette J, Moran MJ. Does anesthesia method affect implant-induced prostate swelling? Urology 2005;65:513-6.

  6. Nash PA, Bruce JE, Indudhara R. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostatic nerve blockade eases systematic needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 1996;155:607-9.

  7. Leibovici D, Zisman A, Siegel YI. Local anesthesia for prostate biopsy by periprostatic lidocaine injection: a double- blind placebo controlled study. J Urol 2002;167(Pt1):563-5.

  8. Soloway MS, Obek C. Periprostatic local anesthesia before ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. J Urol. 2000;163:172-3.

  9. Kravchick S, Peled R, Ben-Dor D. Comparison of different local anesthesia techniques during TRUS-guided biopsies: a prospective pilot study. Urology 2005;65:109-13.

  10. Kravchick S, Yoffe B, Cytron S. Modified perianal/pericapsular anesthesia for transrectal biopsy of prostate in patients with anal rectal problems. Urology 2007;69:139-4.

  11. Irer B, Gulcu A, Aslan G, Goktay Y. Diclofenac suppository administration in conjunction with lidocaine gel during transrectal ultrasoundguided prostate biopsy: prospective, randomized, placebo- controlled study. Urology 2005;66:799-802.

  12. Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Wei JT. Local anesthesia in transrectal prostate biopsy. Urology 2006;67:1283-4.

  13. Akan H, Yildiz O, Dalva I, Yücesoy C. Comparison of two periprostatic nerve blockade techniques for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: bilateral basal injection and single apical injection. Urology 2009;73:23-6.

  14. Horinaga M, Nakashima J, Nakanoma T. Efficacy compared between caudal block and periprostatic local anesthesia for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy. Urology 2006;68:348-51.

  15. Taverna G, Maffezzini M, Benetti A. A single injection of lidocaine as local anesthesia for ultrasound guided needle biopsy of the prostate. J Urol 2002;167:222-3.

  16. Nguyen CT, Jones JS. Comparison of traditional basal and apical periprostatic block: Impact on injection pain and biopsy pain. BJU Int 2007;99:575-8.

  17. Seymour H, Perry MJ, Lee-Elliot C. Pain after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: The advantages of periprostatic local anaesthesia. BJU Int 2001;88:540-4.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2011;71