medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2011; 71 (1)

Reconstrucción total de uretra en masculino con duplicación uretral

Espinosa-Chávez GB, Torres-Medina E, Muñoz-Islas EI, Vilchis-Cardenas M, Acosta-Garduño J
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 22-25
PDF size: 296.77 Kb.


Key words:

Total reconstruction of the urethra, urethral duplication, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Urethral duplication is a very rare congenital abnormality. Its clinical presentation varies according toits anatomical variant. It can be localized from the bladder neck to the distal part of the urethra and it can be complete or incomplete. It is most common at the sagittal plane with a ventral and dorsal urethra, the ventral urethra being the more functional. Management is generally complex and will depend on the type of urethral duplication. The case of a boy with Effmann classification Type II-AY urethral duplication is presented here.
Objective: To demonstrate total reconstruction of the urethra with oral mucosa graft and transverse dorsal preputial flap (Duckett technique) as definitive treatment method in patients with urethral duplication.
Clinical case: In a single surgical operation two approaches were carried out. First, anterior sagittal approach was used to dissect the urethra at the level of the prostatic urethra, isolating the ventral, or functional, urethra and anastomosing a six centimeter tubular oral mucosa graft up to the base of the penis distally at the midline. This was then followed by supine decubitus approach, degloving the prepuce and exposing the axis of the penis at its base. A seven centimeter tubular transverse dorsal preputial flap was proximally anastomosed to the oral mucosa graft up to the external urethral neomeatus at the tip of the glans. A 12 Fr urethral splint was left in place for twenty-one days. The urethral splint was removed on the twenty-first postoperative day, and micturition test was satisfactory. Cystotomy was left in place and removed after six months. Patient presently is without cystotomy catheter and has transurethral micturition. Vesicoureteral reflux was corrected and he continues to be under out-patient surveillance.


REFERENCES

  1. Wein, Kavoussi, Novick, Partin, Peters. Campbell Urology. Panamericana. 9th Edition. 2008.

  2. Wein, Kavoussi, Novick, Partin, Peters. Urología de Campbell. Panamericana. 8a Edición. 2002. pp:2426-2427.

  3. Salle JL, Sibai H, Rosenstein D. Urethral duplication in the male, review 16 cases. J Urol 2000;163:1936-40.

  4. Casselman J, Williams DI. Duplication of urethra. Acta Urol Belg 1996;34:535-41.

  5. Das S, Brosman SA. Duplication of the male urethra. J Urol 1977;117:452-4.

  6. Rice PE, Holder TM, Ashcraft KW. Congenital posterior urethral perienal fistula: a case report. J Urol 1978;119:416-7.

  7. Effman EL, Lewobitz RL, Colodyn AH. Duplication of the urethra. Radiology 1976;119:179-85.

  8. Espinoza CG. Plastia de uretra con injerto de mucosa oral. Rev Mex Urol 2005;65:221-25.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2011;71