medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina Crítica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Med Crit 2011; 25 (3)

Evaluación del espacio muerto ajustado al volumen corriente en pacientes con ventilación mecánica

Magaña MC, Salinas MC, Santiago TJ, Olvera GC, Aguirre SJ, Franco GJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 131-141
PDF size: 400.45 Kb.


Key words:

Dead space, Vd/Vt, tidal volume.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The accurate measurement of physiological dead space to tidal volume ratio (Vd/Vt) is usually omitted in the ICU as exact values need indirect calorimetry to be obtained. Frankelfield modified the original Bohr formula (Vd/Vt = PaCO2 – CO2 et/PaCO2) by including age and Rate Respiratory (RR): Vd/Vt = 0.32 + 0.0106 (PaCO2 – CO2et) + 0.003 (RR) + 0.0015 (age).
Objective: To determine Vd/Vt usefulness in patients under Mechanical ventilation (MV).
Methods: Prospective observational study of all patients under MV admitted from November 2009 to July 2010. Demographics were obtained as well as respiratory parameters. RR, minute, static compliance, tidal volumen (Vt); Vd/Vt were calculated and correlated with variables obtained. Sensitivity and specificity was calculated and Vd/Vt cutoff points were obtained.
Results: 48 patients were included, 16 (42%) female; mean age 53 ± 22; APACHE II score 8 ± 5. Mean Vd/Vt value: 0.52 ± 0.06. Only 10 (20%) were reintubated and had a mean Vd/Vt of 0.50 ± 0.05 vs 0.59 ± 0.53 of successfully extubated ones (p = 0.0001) Best Vd/Vt cutoff value was ≤ 0.55 with 80% sensitivity, 87% specificity, positive predictive value of 62% and negative of 94%.
Conclusions: Patients with Vd/Vt ≤ 0.55 are successfully extubated.


REFERENCES

  1. Alia I, Esteban A. Weaning from mechanical ventilation. Critical Care 2000;4(2):72-80.

  2. Afessa B, Hogans L, Murphy B. Predicting 3-day and 7-day outcomes of weaning from mechanical ventilation. Chest 1999;116:456-461.

  3. Esteban A, Alía I, Ibáñez J, et al. Modes of mechanical ventilation and weaning. A national survey of Spanish hospitals. Chest 1994;106:1188-1193.

  4. MacIntyre NR. Evidence based guidelines for weaning and discontinuing ventilatory support. Chest 2001;120:375-396.

  5. Meade M, Guyatt G, Cook D, et al. Predicting success in weaning from mechanical ventilation. Chest 2001;120:400S-424S.

  6. Sahn SA, Lakshminarayan S. Bedside criteria for discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. Chest 1973;63:1002-1005.

  7. Yang KL, Tobin MJ. A prospective study of indexes predicting the outcome of trials of weaning from mechanical ventilation. New England Journal Med 1991;324:1445-1450.

  8. Lucangelo U, Blanch L. Dead space. Intensive Care Med 2004;30:576-579.

  9. Thompson JE. Capnographic waveforms in the mechanically ventilated patient. Respiratory Care 2005;50:100-108.

  10. Frankenfield DC, et al. Predicting dead space ventilation in critically ill patients using clinically available data. Critical Care Med 2010;38:288-291.

  11. West JB. Ventilación mecánica, fisiopatología pulmonar. Conceptos fundamentales. 2da ed, Argentina 1982:169-180.

  12. Tyburski JG, Carlin AM, Harvey EH. End-tidal CO2- arterial CO2 differences: a useful intraoperative mortality marker in trauma surgery. Journal of Trauma 2003;55:892-896.

  13. Nuckton TJ, Alonso JA, Kallet RH, et al. Pulmonary dead space fraction as a risk factor for death in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. New England J Med 2002;346:1281-1286.

  14. Fletcher R, Johnson B, Cumming G, et al. The concept of dead space with special reference to the single breath test for carbon dioxide. Br J Anesthesia 1981;53:77-88.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Crit. 2011;25