medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Trauma. La urgencia médica de hoy

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2002, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Trauma 2002; 5 (3)

Paramedics in Mexico: Training, experience and recommendations

Arreola-Risa C, Garza CY, Mock CN
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 69-74
PDF size: 54.96 Kb.


Key words:

Paramedics, SME, prehospital care.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Saving the lives of trauma victims depends on adequate prehospital care. Much attention has been focused on hospital based care in recent years. However, increased attention needs to be paid to the development of emergency medical services in Latin America. The cornerstone of EMS is the Paramedic. Objective: To better understand the background, training and trauma experience of the paramedics in Mexico and thus to provide data that will assist with EMS development. Methods: 72 randomly selected paramedics were interviewed from 7 different cities in one state of Northern Mexico. A structured questionnaire was used to obtain information regarding their background, training, trauma experience, and advice regarding ways to improve EMS in our environment. Results: The group interviewed had a median age of 26 years old and a median of 5 years of experience as paramedics. Seventy eight percent had an EMT degree and 22% did not. Fifty five percent worked with a salary and 49% as volunteers. They reported caring for a median of 325 cases of any type per year and. One hundred and fifty trauma cases per year. Spinal. immobilization was used fairly frequently (median of 155 times per year per paramedic), as was oxygen administration (100/year). IV fluids were used moderately frequently (60/year). However, maneuvers to relieve airway obstruction were used infrequently, including oral cannula (only 32/year) and suction (only 32/year). Advanced airway maneuvers, including endotraqueal intubations were used rarely (3/year). The paramedics indicated the following impediments that prevented them from taking optimal care of the injured: bad conditions or not updated equipment (79%), training (14%), communication with hospitals, lack of cooperation among corporations (4% each). They provided the following suggestions as ways to improve EMS: improved continuing education (56%), improved team work (24%), ambulance-hospital communication (15%) and unifying criteria (10%). Conclusions: The paramedics indicated an extensive experience with prehospital trauma care. However, a significant number of paramedics do not have even basic EMT degrees. Improvements in EMS in our environment need to focus on providing this basic EMT training to all who work in EMS and to provide continuing education for those who have finished their basic training. Other priorities include improvements in maintenance of equipment and in prehospital communication, administration and organization.


REFERENCES

  1. Smith GS, Barss P. Heridas no intencionadas en países en vías de desarrollo: la epidemiología de un problema negligente. Epidemiologic Reviews. 1991; 13: 228-266.

  2. Zwi A. La carga de las lesiones de salud pública en países en vías de desarrollo. Tropical Diseases Bulletin.

  3. Krug EG, Sharma GK, Lozano R. La carga global de lesiones. Am J Pub Health. 2000; 90: 523-526.

  4. Almanza-Cruz S. Hechos que afectan el cuidado de lesiones en México. Gaceta Médica de México 1993; 129: 157-180.

  5. H´ijar-Médicina MC. La mortalidad debido a un accidente y lesiones no intencionadas en el Distrito Federal desde 1970-1986. Salud Pública de México 1990; 32: 395-404.

  6. Arreola-Risa C, Speare JOR. Trauma en México. Trauma Quarterly 1999; 14(3): 211-220.

  7. Arreola-Risa C, Mock CN, Padilla D et al. Sistema de cuidado de trauma en América Latina: las prioridades deben ser prehospitalarias y un manejo en sala de emergencia. J Trauma 1995; 39: 457-462.

  8. Mock CN, Jurkovich GJ, nii-Amon-Kotei D, Arreola-Risa C, Maier RV. El patrón de mortalidad en trauma en 3 naciones con diferente estrato económico: implicar el desarrollo de un sistema global de sistema de trauma. J Trauma 1998; 44: 804-814.

  9. Arreola-Risa C, Mock CN, Lojero L et al. Mejorías en el bajo costo de cuidados de trauma prehospitalario en una ciudad de América Latina. J Trauma 2000; 48: 119-124.

  10. Ali J, Adam RU, Gana TJ, Williams JI. El resultado en pacientes de trauma después de un programa prehospitalario de TLS. Journal of Trauma 1997; 42: 1018-1022.

  11. Ali J, Adam RU, Gana TJ, Bedaysie H, Williams JI. El efecto de un programa de soporte de vida en trauma en un cuidado de trauma prehospitalario. Journal of Trauma 1997; 42: 786-790.

  12. Marson A, Thomson J. La influencia del manejo prehospitalario de trauma en la mortalidad de accidente de tráfico. Journal of Trauma 2001; 50: 917-921.

  13. McSwain N (Ed). Pre-hospital Trauma Life Support. (3rd Ed). St Louis: Mosby-Year Book, Inc; 1994.

  14. Campbell JE. Basic trauma life support for the TUM-B and first responders. Prentice-Hall; 1997.

  15. Campbell JE. Basic trauma life support for paramedics and advanced SME providers. Prentice-Hall; 1997.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Trauma. 2002;5