medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2011; 25 (4)

Effectiveness of sodium hyaluronate in patients with gonarthrosis: randomized comparative study

Pérez-Serna AG, Negrete-Corona J, Chávez-Hinojosa E, López-Mariscal C
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 208-215
PDF size: 70.53 Kb.


Key words:

osteoarthritis, hyaluronic acid, joint, pain, synovial fluid, comparative study.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Hyaluronic acid is a major component of synovial fluid and cartilage; it plays an essential role in joint function. This concept is based on the hypothesis that intraarticular sodium hyaluronate injections improve articular function upon restoring synovial fluid viscosupplementation and promoting endogenous synthesis. Material and methods: Forty randomly selected patients older than 50 years of age, with a diagnosis of gonarthrosis, standard treatment-naďve, were divided into two 20-patient groups. The first group was treated with five 2.5 ml doses of hyaluronic acid, at one dose per week. The second group was treated with a single 2 ml dose of intraarticular methylprednisolone. A survey containing the Womac functional scale and the pain visual analogue scale was applied to both groups before and 3 months after treatment. Results: A statistically significant reduction in pain (visual analogue scale) was observed 3 months after treatment in group H (1.6 ± 0.88) and group M (2.95 ± 1.84), as well as a functional post-treatment improvement in the Womac scale. Results for post-treatment pain were 5.43 ± 1.05 for group H and 7.86 ± 0.77 for group M; results for post-treatment stiffness were 3.05 ± 0.82 for group H and 3.7 ± 0.85 for group M; and finally for post-treatment functional capacity the results were 12.25 ± 0.82 for group H and 18.95 ± 0.85 for group M. Conclusion: Intraarticular sodium hyaluronate is more effective for pain and function than methylprednisolone. However, itinvolves higher costs than conservative treatment and fewer costs than surgical treatment, as well as the discomfort resulting from repeated intraarticular injections and the possibility of anaphylactic reaction.


REFERENCES

  1. Jones G, Bennell K, Cicuttini FM: Effect of physical activity on cartilage development in healthy kids. Br J Sports Med 2003; 37: 382-3.

  2. Roos EM, Dahlberg L: Positive effects of moderate exercise on glycosaminoglycan content in knee cartilage. Arthrit Rheum 2005; 52: 3507-14.

  3. Pearle AD, Warren RF, Rodeo SA: Basis science of articular cartilage and osteoarthritis. Clin Sports Med 2005; 24: 1-12.

  4. Brown WE, Potter HG, Marx RG, et al: Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of cartilage repair in the knee. Clin Orthop 2004; 422: 214-23.

  5. Mithoefer K, Williams RJ, Warren RF, et al: The microfracture technique for treatment of articular cartilage lesions in the knee: a prospective cohort evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87A: 1911-20.

  6. Figueroa D, Calvo R, Vaisman A, et al: Knee chondral lesions: incidence and correlation between arthroscopic and magnetic resonance findings. Arthoscopy 2007; 23: 312-5.

  7. Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ, et al: Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2003; 19: 477-84.

  8. Gobbi A, Nunag P, Malinowski K: Treatment of chondral lesions of the knee with microfracture in a group of athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2005; 13: 213-21.

  9. Guettler JH, Demetropoulos CK, Yang KH, et al: Osteochondral defects in the human knee: influence of defect size on cartilage rim stress and load redistribution to surrounding cartilage. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32: 1451-8.

  10. Gossec L, Dougados M: Intra-articular treatments in osteoarthritis: from the symptomatic to the structure modifying. Ann Rheum Dis 2004; 63: 478-82.

  11. Moreland LW: Intra-articular hyaluronan (hyaluronic acid) and hylans for the treatment of osteoarthritis: Mechanisms of action. Arthritis Resther 2003; 5: 54-67.

  12. Stove J, Gerlach C, Huch K, Gunther KP, Puhl W, Scharf HP: Effects of hyaluronan on proteoglycan content of osteoarthritic chondrocytes in vitro. J Orthop Res 2002; 20: 551-5.

  13. Breedveld Fc, Van Laar Jm: Comparison of efficacy of arthroscopic lavage plus administration of corticosteroids, arthroscopic lavage plus administration of placebo, and joint aspiration plus administration of corticosteroids in arthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 55: 964-70.

  14. Seth SL, Brigham BR, Warme WJ, Paul AW, Pettis PD, Shott S: Corticosteroid compared with hyaluronic acid injections for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85: 1197-203.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Ortop Mex. 2011 Jul-Ago;25