medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana

Anales de Otorrinolaringología Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Otorrinolaringología 2011; 56 (3)

Percutaneous dilational tracheostomy vs open tracheostomy. Experience at Hospital Angeles Lomas, Mexico

Garza HH, Maycotte LS, Durán ALM, Álvarez RRD, Estrada ÁG
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 125-127
PDF size: 152.34 Kb.


Key words:

percutaneous dilation tracheostomy, open tracheostomy, complications.

ABSTRACT

Background: Tracheostomy is a very common procedure. Open surgical tracheostomy, that is the conventional procedure, has evolved up to diminish the rate of complications. In 1955 percutaneous tracheostomy arises and has been gaining popularity among the otolaryngologists and critical care physicians as an effective measure in the managing of the airway.
Objective: To report our experience in the accomplishment of percutaneous tracheostomy vs open tracheostomy in critically ill patients at Hospital Angeles Lomas.
Patients and method: A retrospective and comparative study which included all patients in the intensive care unit at Hospital Angeles Lomas who underwent open tracheostomy and percutaneous dilation tracheostomy from1999 to 2007. All patients had endotracheal intubation and had no history of tracheostomy. We reviewed directly each of the records.
Results: In open tracheotomy, we found eight cases of bleeding, eight cases of cutaneous infection, 13 cases of edema and three air leak. In three cases of percutaneous tracheostomy, we found bleeding, none by infection, five of edema and two cases of air leak.
Conclusions: Percutaneous dilation is the technique of choice to perform a tracheostomy, since it causes less postoperative complications.


REFERENCES

  1. Frost E. Tracing the tracheostomy. Ann Otol 1976;85:618-624.

  2. Eavey R. The history of tracheotomy. In: Myers E, Johnson J, Murry T, et al. Tracheotomy: Airway management, Communication and swallowing. San Diego: Singular; 1998:1-8.

  3. Jackson C. Tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 1909;19:285-290.

  4. Sheldon C, Pudenz R, Freshwater D. New method for tracheotomy. J Neurosur 1955;12:428-431.

  5. Ciaglia P, Firsching R, Syniec C. Elective percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Chest 1985;87:715-719.

  6. Dulguerov P, Gysin C, Perneger T. Percutaneous or surgical tracheostomy: a meta-analysis. Crit Care Med 1999;27:1617-1625.

  7. Massick D, Yao S, Powell D, Griesen D. Bedside tracheostomy in the intensive care unit: A prospective randomized trial comparing open surgical tracheostomy with endoscopically guided percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. Laryngoscope 2001;111:494-500.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Otorrinolaringología. 2011;56