medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2011; 71 (5)

Specificity of PCA3 determination in urine for prostate cancer detection in Mexican patients

Saavedra-Briones DV, Rodríguez-Dorantes M, Morales-Montor JG, Salido-Guadarrama I, Merayo-Chalico CE, Hernández-Castellanos Víctor A, Sánchez-Turati Gustavo J, Santana-Ríos Z, Urdiales-Ortiz A, Fulda-Graue S, Ahumada-Tamayo S, Fernández-Noyola G, Martínez JA, Cantellano-Orozco M, Pacheco-Gahbler C
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 268-273
PDF size: 333.16 Kb.


Key words:

Prostate cancer, biopsy, detection, PCA3 mRNA, PSA mRNA, total PSA, gray zone, percent-free PSA, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Background: Prostate cancer holds first place as cause of death from neoplasms, ahead of cancer of the trachea, bronchial tubes, and lung. Specificity of prostate specific antigen and rectal examination varies from 24-37%. First biopsy is negative in over 75% of men with prostate specific antigen values ranging from 2.5-10 ng/mL or with suspicious rectal examination. Thus biopsy positive predictive value is very low. PCA3 gene determination in urine has shown 72% specificity and 58% sensitivity.
Objective: To establish clinical usefulness through measuring the specificity of PCA3 determination in urine for prostate cancer diagnosis in biopsy of Mexican patients at the Hospital General “Dr. Manuel Gea González”.
Methods: A total of one hundred and fifty-seven patients with serum prostate specific antigen above 4 ng/mL or abnormal rectal examination were included in the study. The first 20-30 mL of urine were collected after prostate massage prior to transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy. Twelve cores were taken from each patient. Samples were deposited in tubes containing 20 mL of nucleic acid stabilizing solution. PCA3 rate was calculated with relative expression of PCA3 mRNA. PCA3 performance was evaluated in terms of sensitivity and specificity when comparing results with biopsy results.
Results: Of the one hundred and fifty-seven patients, thirty-nine of them (25%) had biopsies that were positive for cancer, and three patients had undetermined or negative PCA3. Gleason score was 3+3 in nineteen patients (49%), 4+3 in one patient (2.5%), 3+5 in one patient (2.5%), 4+3 in three patients (8%), 4+4 in ten patients (26%), 5+4 in one patient (2.5%), and 5+5 in one patient (2.5%). Area under the curve in the receiver operating characteristic curve for PCA3 was 0.72 ( 95% CI 0.59-0.85) with a P=0.005. Total serum prostate specific antigen showed an area under the curve of 0.69 (95% CI 0.52-0.86). Receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine sensitivity and specificity of the test for PCA3 with different cut-off points. Using 26 as cut-off point, the test showed 68% sensitivity and 74% specificity. Positive predictive value for PCA3 was 45% and negative predictive value was 94%.
Conclusions: Specificity and negative predictive value for the PCA3 test showed it can be useful as a tumor marker in urine, increasing precision in prostate cancer diagnosis.


REFERENCES

  1. INEGI. Febrero 2010, www.inegi.org.mx.

  2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58:71-96.

  3. Deras IL, Aubin SM, Blase A, et al. PCA3: a molecular urine assay for predicting prostate biopsy outcome. J Urol 2008;179:1587-92.

  4. Haese A, De la Taille A, et al. Clinical Utility of the PCA3 Urine Assay in European Men Scheduled for Repeat Biopsy. Eur Urol 2008;54:1081-8.

  5. Heidenreich A, Aus G, Bolla M, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2008;54:693-5.

  6. Raja J, Ramachandran N, Munneke G, Patel U. Current status of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Clin Radiol 2006;61:142-53.

  7. Tinzl M, Marberger M, Horvath S, Chypre C. DD3PCA3 RNA analysis in urine—a new perspective for detecting prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2004;46:182-186.

  8. Wright L, Lange P, et al. Newer Potential Biomarkers in Prostate Cancer. Rev Urol 2007;9:207-13.

  9. Bussemakers MJ, van Bokhoven A, Verhaegh GW, et al. A new prostate- specific gene, highly overexpressed in prostate cancer. Cancer Res 1999;59:5975-9.

  10. Hessels D, Klein Gunnewiek JM, van Oort I, et al. DD3 (PCA3)-based molecular urine analysis for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2003;44:8-15.

  11. Schalken JA, Hessels D, Verhaegh G. New targets for therapy in prostate cancer: differential display code 3 (DD3 (PCA3)), a highly prostate cancer-specific gene. Urology 2003;62(5Suppl1):34-43.

  12. De Kok JB, et al. DD3PCA3, a very sensitive and specific marker to detect prostate tumors. Cancer Res 2002;62:2695-8.

  13. Groskopf J, Aubin SM, Deras IL, et al. APTIMA PCA3 molecular urine test: development of a method to aid in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Clin Chem 2006;52:1089-95.

  14. Marks LS, Fradet Y, Deras IL, et al. PCA3 molecular urine assay for prostate cancer in men undergoing repeat biopsy. Urology 2007;69:532-5.

  15. Shappell SB. Clinical utility of prostate carcinoma molecular diagnostic tests. Rev Urol 2008;10:44-69.

  16. Fradet Y, Saad F, Aprikian A, et al. uPM3, a new molecular urine test for the detection of prostate cancer. Urology 2004;64:311-5.

  17. Chun F, De la Taille A, et al. Prostate cancer gene 3 (PCA3): Development and internal validation of a novel biopsy nomogram. Eur Urol 2010;57:e1.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2011;71