medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina Crítica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Med Crit 2012; 26 (1)

Correlation between cardiac output by thermodilution and vco2 measure

Díaz EA, Monares ZE, Aguirre SJ, Poblano MM, Camarena AG, Franco GJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 36-41
PDF size: 82.35 Kb.


Key words:

Cardiac output, hemodynamic monitoring, venoarterial CO2 difference, intensive care.

ABSTRACT

In the critically ill patient resuscitation, cardiac output (CO) is an invaluable measure. Currently available methods require the use of invasive devices based on thermodilution principle or contour analysis of pulse wave with sophisticated devices and not is easily accessible, while noninvasive calculation using Fick’s equation has high bias. From models of rebreathing carbon dioxide (CO2) and venoarterial CO2 difference formula was made to estimate the production of CO2 and cardiac output.
Objective: The purpose of this work is to perform cardiac output measurement using modified Fick’s formula and correlated with cardiac output obtained by thermodilution and Fick equation.
Methods: We obtained data from patients which were determined cardiac output by thermodilution and proposed formula, both values ​​are compared using Pearson correlation.
Results: We analyzed 74 index measurements where Pearson correlation was 0.67 between the two measurements. The correlation between the value of cardiac output and venoarterial difference was -0.36 which is expected by the components of the formula. A correlation between hemoglobin and venoarterial difference was -0.1 and 0.076 in to oxygen saturation concerns.
Conclusions: The measurement of cardiac output by correlation formula was low correlation and should be review and compare with other methods of measurement.


REFERENCES

  1. Vallet B, Teboul JL, Cain S, Curtis S. Venoarterial CO2 difference during regional ischemic or hypoxic hypoxia. J Appl Physiol 2000;89:1317-1321.

  2. Faisy C, Lerolle N, Dachraoui F, et al. Impact of energy deficit calculated by a predictive method on outcome in medical patients requiring prolonged acute mechanical ventilation. Brit J Nutr 2008;9:1-9.

  3. Gutiérrez G. A mathematical model of tissue-blood carbon dioxide exchange during hypoxia. AJRCCM 2004;169(4):525-533.

  4. Kothari N, Amaria T, Hegde A, et al. Measurement of cardiac output: Comparison of four different methods. IJTCVS 2003;19:163-168.

  5. Murias EG, Villagrá A, Vatua S. Evaluation of a noninvasive method for cardiac output measurement in critical care patients. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:1470-1474.

  6. Siddiki H, Kojicic M, Li G. Bedside quantification of dead-space fraction using routine clinical data in patients with acute lung injury: secondary analysis of two prospective trials. Critical Care 2010.

  7. Young BP, Low LL. Noninvasive monitoring cardiac output using partial CO2 rebreathing. Crit Care Clin 2010;26:383-392.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Crit. 2012;26