medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Especialidades Médico-Quirúrgicas

Instituto de Seguridad y Servicios Sociales de los Trabajadores del Estado
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2005, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Esp Med Quir 2005; 10 (2)

Invaginaciones intestinales poco comunes

Jiménez-Urueta PS, Alvarado-García R, Gallego GJE
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 43-46
PDF size: 112.00 Kb.


Key words:

intestinal intussusception, ileo-ileal-ileocolical, intestinal necrosis.

ABSTRACT

Objective: The outcome of 11 patients treated for intestinal intussusception (10 ileo-ileal and 1 colo-colic), from 1978 to 1999. Material and methods: This was a retrospective descriptive trial. Age, sex, outcome, clinical manifestations, laboratory test, preoperative diagnosis, type of surgery and congenital abnormalities were analyzed. Results: 68 patients with intestinal intussusception, 11 of them were in uncommon segments (16%), 10 ileo-ileal and one colo-colical. The youngest patient was 2 months old and the oldest one 11 years old. Progress time was over 24 hours in 10 cases (91%). Vomiting was the most common symptom in 8 patients, pain in 6, and fever in 4. The type of surgery was Intestinal resection with termino-terminal anastomosis in 8 cases (72.7%). 2 patients had complications: one of them had reintussusception and the other one had intestinal sub-occlusion. Discussion: The progress time is over 24 hours in a high percentage of cases (90%), explaining the low suspicion of the diagnosis and clinical features suggesting at first instance surgical complications of an intestinal infectious process and or appendicitis. It depends on a good medical management of the intestinal segment, and an adequate postoperative care.


REFERENCES

  1. David LC, Vidal R. Surgical implications of Henoch-Schonlein púrpura. J Pediat Sur; 1990; 25: 742-43

  2. Cruz MF Alfonso AM, Andrade VW. Invaginación intestinal-Hospital pediátrico de Coimbra. An Esp Pediatr 1991: 37: 200-204

  3. Stringer MD, Pablot SM, Bereton RJ. Pediatric intussusception. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 867-76

  4. Martinez-Fontanilla LA Haase GM et al. Surgical complications in Henoch-Schonlein púrpura. J Pediatr Sur 1984; 19: 424-235

  5. Margarit Mallol J. Invaginación Intestinal Aguda: reducción hidrostática vs. Reducción neumática. Ann Esp pediatr 1993; 38:17-19

  6. Shekhawat NS, Pronhakar G, Sinha DB. Nonischemic intussusception in childhood. J Pediatr Sur 1992: 27: 1433-5

  7. Duarte VJC, Sainz CR, Ariza AFA, Hernandez-Peredo RG, Gutierrez UJA, Barraza R. Resección intestinal para tratar la necrosis debida a invaginación. Acta Pediatr Mex 1999, 20(6):284-9

  8. Katz ME, Kolm P: Intussusception reduction 1991. An international survey of pediatric radiologist. Pediatr Radiol 1992; 22:318-22

  9. Verschelden P, Filiatrault D, Garel L, Girgnon A et al: intrussusception in children: reliability of US in diagnosis prospective study. Radiology 1992;182:741-4

  10. Couture A, Veyrac, Galifer RB, Armelin I Evaluation of abdominal pain in Henoch-Schonlein syndrome by higg frecuency ultrasound. Pediatr Radiol 1992; 22: 12-7

  11. Shuh AJ. Colotomy with minimum for advanced irreductible intrussusception. J Pediatr Surg 1991: 26; 462-43

  12. Zamir O, Hadari A, Arad I. Intussusceptions in the premature infant. Pediatr Surg Int. 1986;1:187-8




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Esp Med Quir. 2005;10