medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Orthotips AMOT

ISSN 2007-8560 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión Científica de la Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Ortopedia y Traumatología, A.C. (FEMECOT)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Ortho-tips 2012; 8 (1)

Síndrome de la salida torácica neurogénica. Revisión etiopatológica. Serie de casos

Reynoso CR
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 37-48
PDF size: 349.08 Kb.


Key words:

Thoracic outlet, cervical rib, neuralgia, hand, syndrome.

ABSTRACT

The definition of thoracic outlet (SST) is set to the virtual space to funnel shaped, which leads the nerve and vascular structures on their way to the upper limb. The incidence of a cervical rib partial or total is up to the 1 in the population, but only develops symptoms 10 of these cases. The SST occurs in women 3 times more than men, in the range between 30 to 45 years mainly. The semiologyc spectrum is essentially neuropathic and non-vascular and as such, the structuring of the signs and symptoms is consolidated over a long period of time from 2 and a half years average. Typical thoracic exit, also known as neuralgia cervicobrachial painful irradiation is the first of its cardinal symptoms and depends on the compressed nerve structure. To make the diagnosis must register the progression of symptoms, not enough to be conclusive in diagnosis, which requires ruling out other pathologies. The presence of partial cervical rib I mega process transverse C7 is associated with muscle variants or constrictive bands. Treatment begins with rehabilitation while clamping the diagnosis (relaxing muscle, relaxation of the mass of muscle, sliding of the brachial plexus, ultrasound, heat, interescapular, analgesics), 53 patients in the surgical series were operated due to poor response to the management of rehabilitation and major alteration of their occupational and everyday activities.


REFERENCES

  1. Brantigan CO. Diagnosing thoracic outlet syndrome. Hand Clin 2004; 20: 27-36.

  2. Redenbach DM. A comparative study of structures comprising the thoracic outlet in 250 human cadavers and 72 surgical cases of thoracic outlet syndrome. Europ J Cardio Thorac Surg 1998; 13: 353-360.

  3. Atasoy E. A hand surgeon’s further experience with thoracic outlet compression syndrome. J Hand Surg 2010; 35A: 1528-1538.

  4. Fodor M. Anomalies of thoracic outlet in human fetuses: Anatomical study. Ann Vasc Surg 2011; 25(7): 961-968.

  5. Roos DB. Pathophysiology of congenital anomalies in thoracic outlet syndrome. Am J Surg 1976; 132: 771-778.

  6. Pollack EW. Surgical anatomy of the thoracic outlet syndrome. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1980; 150: 97-103.

  7. Surgical treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome: Effect and results of surgery. Ann of Thorac Surg 2003; 75: 1901-1906.

  8. Novak C. Thoracic outlet syndrome. Clin Plastic Surg 2003; 30: 175-188.

  9. Upton ARM. The double crush in nerve-entrapment syndromes. Lancet 1973; 2: 359-362.

  10. Brantigan CO. Etiology of neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome. Hand Clin 2004; 20: 17-22.

  11. Sanders RJ. Ethiology and pathology. Hand Clin 2004; 20: 23-32.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ortho-tips. 2012;8