medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Enf Infec Microbiol 2012; 32 (4)

Antimicrobial resistance of bacterial isolates in an Adult Intensive Care Unit

Cornejo AJR, Ramírez RA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 127-133
PDF size: 159.99 Kb.


Key words:

Antimicrobial resistance, ESKAPE, Acinetobacter baumanii, MRSA, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, ESBL, Escherichia coli.

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION. In Intensive Care Units, bacterial resistance accounts for a large incidence, as specific clinical settings appear to the development of multidrug resistant pathogens.
OBJECTIVE. To determine the proportion of bacterial susceptibility to antimicrobial agents in the Adults Intensive Care Unit (AICU).
PATIENTS AND METHODS. A retrospective, observational and transversal study was made in the Hospital de Alta Especialidad Christus Muguerza. We analyzed all the cultures with positive bacterial isolates, obtained from January 1st, 2010 to June 30th, 2011, of 18 years old and older patients admitted to the AICU for any cause. We calculated frequency and proportion for specific antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance for each bacterial strain, presenting only those antimicrobials recommended by the CLSI for each bacterial family using an isolation and patient based algorithms.
RESULTS. We analyzed a total of 361 isolations, documenting a total of 28 bacterial species, the more frequent were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumanii, Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus epidermidis and Klebsiella pneumonia. The susceptibility analysis for each bacterial strain is detailed forward. We detected ESBL-producing Escherichia coli in 22% of the total samples, ESBL-producing Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 64% of the total strains analyzed with an XDR resistance pattern, Acinetobacter baumanii, already an XDR strain, with tendency to be a PDR, and MRSA with a phenotypic resistance pattern of a hospital acquired strain with XDR tendency, but still susceptible to the recommended first line antimicrobials in the management of associated infections.
CONCLUSIONS. The isolation of the ESKAPE pathogens are a continuous problem in the Intensive Care Units, as development of XDR and PDR are a real challenge in the treatment of this infections.



REFERENCES

  1. Spellberg, B. “Antibiotic Resistance: Promoting Critically Needed Antibiotic Research and Development and Appropiate Use (“Stewardship”) of these Precious Drugs”. Testimony of the Infectious Diseases Society of America 2010. Consultado en línea:

  2. Gasink LB, Lautenbach E. “Prevention and Treatment of Health Care-Acquired Infections”. Med Clin North Am 2008; 92: 295-313.

  3. Volles DF, Branan T. “Antibiotics in the Intensive Care Unit: Focus on Agents for Resistant Pathogens”. Emerg Med Clin North Am2008; 26: 813-834.

  4. Fraimow HS, Tsigrelis C. “Antimicrobial Resistance in the Intensive Care Unit: Mechanisms, Epidemiology, and Management of Specific Resistant Pathogens”. Crit Care Clin2011; 27: 163-205.

  5. Lodise TP, Drusano G. “Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics: Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy in the Intensive Care Unit”. Crit Care Clin2011; 27: 1-18.

  6. Falagas ME, Karageorgopoulos DE. Pandrug Resistance (PDR), Extensive Drug Resistance (XDR), and Multidrug Resistance (MDR) among Gram-Negative Bacilli: Need for International Harmonization in Terminology. Clin Infect Dis2008; 46(7): 1121-1122.

  7. Hindler JF, Stelling J. “Analysis and Presentation of Cumulative Antibiograms: A New Consensus Guideline from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute”. Clin Infect Dis2007;44: 867-73.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Enf Infec Microbiol. 2012;32