medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Plástica

ISSN 2992-8559 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0625 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Cir Plast 2012; 22 (1)

Histological analysis of cartilage-gelatin sponge (Spongostan®)-wrapped grafts in Wistar rats: experimental study

Ortiz LJB, Vallarta RRA, Lavenant BMI, Esquivel CVA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 11-16
PDF size: 331.51 Kb.


Key words:

Cartilage graft, cartilage feasibility, Gelfoam, Spongostan.

ABSTRACT

The Gelfoam® or Spongostan® gelatin sponge is a water-insoluble and porous haemostatic medical material that has been used for more than 70 years. Some surgeons use it in rhinoplasties for cartilage graft stability on nasal dorsum. Some articles favour the use of this biomaterial as a cartilage matrix with apparent maintenance of cartilage viability; however, there is no histological supporting evidence. We carried out a prospective and comparative experimental study between four cartilage sample groups associated with Spongostan®, taken eight weeks after subcutaneous implantation in Wistar rats to describe and compare six histological characteristics decisive in cartilage feasibility. We evidenced a loose fibroblastic response in the Spongostan® and cartilage sample 2.42 times higher versus isolate cartilage and 2.17 times higher versus isolated gelatin sponge, 100% cartilage feasibility and cartilage neoformation 10.31 times lower compared to the isolated cartilage. This biomaterial related to the cartilage graft allows: no graft movement, cartilage feasibility maintenance, complete gelatin sponge absorption and maintenance of «controlled» condrocite differentiation.


REFERENCES

  1. Jenkins HP, Senz EH, Owen H et al. Present status of gelatin sponge for control of hemorrhage. JAMA 1946; 132: 614-619.

  2. Correll JT, Prentice HR, Wise EC. Biologic investigations of a new absorbable sponge. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1945; 181: 585-589.

  3. López IR. Rinoplastia abierta versus rinoplastia cerrada. Conferencia en la sesión mensual académica de la Asociación Mexicana de Cirugía Plástica, Estética y Reconstructiva. México, D.F. Agosto de 2011.

  4. Erol OO. The Turkish delight: a pliable graft for rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105: 1838-1849.

  5. Yilmaz S, Erçöçen AR, Can Z et al. Viability of diced, crushed cartilage grafts and the effects of surgicel (oxidized regenerated cellulose) on cartilagegrafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108: 1054-1060.

  6. Guerrerosantos J, Trabanino C, Guerrerosantos F. Multifragmented cartilage wrapped with fascia in augmentation rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 804-12.

  7. Calvert JW, Brenner K, Daniel RK. Histological analysis of human diced cartilage grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 118: 230-36.

  8. Vallarta RRA, Ortiz LJB, Vázquez AMG. Matriz condrocitaria tridimensional en rinoplastia cerrada. Cir Plast 2010; 20(2): 78-86.

  9. Zalzal GH, Cotton RT, McAdams AJ. Cartilage grafts: present status. Head Neck Surg 1986; 8(5): 363-374.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Plast. 2012;22