medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Investigación Clínica

Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Invest Clin 2012; 64 (3)

The usefulness of the buffy coat smear and panbacterial polymerase chain reaction in early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis

García-Elorriaga G, Cortés-Torres N, Ballesteros-del-Olmo JC, Del Rey-Pineda G, González-Bonilla C
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 27
Page: 275-283
PDF size: 183.09 Kb.


Key words:

Bacteriologic stains, Molecular diagnosis, Neonatal sepsis, Buffy coat.

ABSTRACT

Objective. In this study are evaluated the usefulness of the buffy coat smear and panbacterial polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as diagnostic tests in the early detection of neonatal sepsis. Material and methods. It was studied 49 patients aged up to 28 days who were hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit (ICUs) of the Neonatology, with a clinical diagnosis of neonatal sepsis and 49 umbilical cord samples of healthy newborns. Blood cultures and 50 μL of plasma were taken for the DNA and performance of the broad-range PCR primer system (panbacterial PCR). Simultaneously, were taken three capillaries with blood for the leukocyte layer (buffy coat) smear, we performed three stains: Gram; Löeffler blue methylene (LBM), and acridine orange (AO). Statistical analysis included sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) against the clinical diagnosis. Results. With respect to stains of buffy coat smear, they resulted very specific, from 90-97%, with 64-75% sensitivity, 87-94% PPV, and 77-82% NPV. In inverse fashion, PCR resulted very sensitive at 96%, with 91% specificity, 92% PPV, and 96% NPV. Conclusions. Buffy coat smear stains are easy, fast, and specific, while that of PCR was highly sensitive. Thus, both can be utilized as diagnostic tests.


REFERENCES

  1. Goldstein B, Giroir B, Randolph A. International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics. Pediatric Crit Care Med 2005; 6: 1-8.

  2. Ballesteros-del-Olmo JC, Merás-Montoya AI. Infecciones en Neonatología en un tercer nivel de atención. Boletín de la Academia Mexicana de Pediatría 2006. Disponible en: http:// www.academiamexicanadepediatria.com.mx/publicaciones/academicos opinan/otras.php

  3. Rodríguez-Weber MA, López-Candiani C, Arredondo-García JL, Gutiérrez-Castrellón P, Sánchez-Arriaga F. Morbilidad y mortalidad por sepsis neonatal en un hospital de tercer nivel de atención. Sal Pub Mex 2003; 45: 90-5.

  4. Sundaram V, Kumar P, Dutta S, Mukhopadhyay K, Ray P, Gautam V, et al. Blood culture confirmed bacterial sepsis in neonates in a North Indian tertiary care center: changes over the last decade. Jpn J Infect Dis 2009; 60: 46-50.

  5. Ballesteros JC, Rodríguez C, Morales M, García-E G, García- RP, Vega-G J, et al. Indicadores de infección temprana en septicemia neonatal. Rev Mex Pediatr 1996; 63: 17-24.

  6. Kumarcs V, Neelagaud YF. Incubation period for culture positivity to detect septicemia in neonates. Indian J Med Microbiol 2005; 23: 270-1.

  7. McCabe W, LaPorte J. Intracellular bacteria in the peripheral blood in Staphylococcal bacteremia. Ann Intern Med 1962; 57: 141-3.

  8. Faden H. Early diagnosis of neonatal bacteremia by buffy coat examination. J Pediatr 1976; 88: 1032-4.

  9. Lemus-Varela ML, Alberto VS, Arriaga-Dávila JJ. Clinical and laboratory parameters in neonatal nosocomial sepsis. Gac Med Mex 2008; 144: 409-11.

  10. Gérard HC, Wang Z, Wang GF, El-Gabalawy H, Goldbach- Mansky R, Li Y, et al. Chromosomal DNA from a variety of bacterial species is present in synovial tissue from patients with various forms of arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44: 1689-97.

  11. Dutta S, Narang A, Chakraborty A, Ray P. Diagnosis of neonatal sepsis using universal primer polymerase chain reaction before and after starting antibiotic therapy. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2009; 163: 6-11.

  12. Ohlin A, Bäckman A, Björkqvist M, Mölling P, Jurstrand M, Schollin J. Real-time PCR of the 16S-rRNA gene in the diagnosis of neonatal bacteraemia. Acta Paediatr 2008; 97: 1376-80.

  13. Chomczynski P. A reagent for the single-step simultaneous isolation of RNA, DNA and proteins from cell and tissue samples. Biotechniques 1993; 15: 532-7.

  14. Gutell RR, Larsen N, Woese CR. Lesson from an evolving rRNA: 16S and 23S structures from a comparative perspective. Microbiol Rev 1994; 58: 10-26.

  15. Ponce-de-León S. Como leer revistas médicas para aprender sobre una prueba diagnóstica. Rev Invest Clin 1988; 40: 73-83.

  16. Gutiérrez-Muñoz UH, Gutiérrez-Muñoz J, Rosas-Barrientos V. Factores de riesgo en sepsis neonatal en un hospital de tercer nivel en la Ciudad de México. Revista de Especialidades Médico- Quirúrgicas, ISSSTE 2005; 10: 21-4.

  17. Murgía M, Mancilla J. Programa de actualización continúa en neonatología. Libro 7. México: Intersistemas Editores; 2004.

  18. Manroe BL, Weinberg AG, Rosenfeld CR, Browne R. The neonatal blood count in health and disease. I. Reference values for neutrophilic cells. J Pediatr 1979; 95: 89-98.

  19. Isaacman DJ, Karasic RB, Reynolds EA, Krost SI. Effect of number of blood cultures and volume of blood and detection of bacteremia in children. J Pediatr 1996; 128: 190-5.

  20. Mangurten HH, Le Beau LJ. Diagnosis of neonatal bacteremia by a microblood culture technique. J Pediatr 1997; 90: 990.

  21. Domínguez-Sosa J, Vila-Ruiz F, Setién-Castillo IA. Prevalencia y resistencia bacteriana en una unidad de cuidados intensivos neonatales. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología 2005; 25(3).

  22. Ballesteros-del-Olmo JC, Tena-Reyes D, García-Elorriaga G, Vega-García A, Ramírez-Ortiz M, Sosa-Maldonado J, et al. Sensibilidad y especificidad del frotis de buffy coat teñido con Gram en el diagnóstico de sepsis neonatal. Rev Mex Pediatr 2008; 75: 97-102.

  23. Zamora-Castorena S, Murgía-de Sierra MF. Cinco años de experiencia con sepsis neonatal en un centro pediátrico. Rev Invest Clin 1998; 50: 463-70.

  24. Kostiala A, Jormalainen S, Kosunen T. Detection of experimental bacteremia and fungemia by examination of buffy coat prepared by a micromethod. Am J Clin Pathol 1979; 72: 437-43.

  25. Melly MA, Thomison JB, Rogers DE. Fate of staphylococci within human leukocytes. J Exp Med 1960; 112: 1121-30.

  26. Figueras-Aloy J, Gómez-López L, Rodríguez-Miguélez JM, Salvia-Roiges MD, Jordán-García I, Ferrer-Codina I, et al. Serum soluble ICAM-1, VCAM-1, L-selectin, and P-selectin levels as markers of infection and their relation to clinical severity in neonatal sepsis. Am J Perinatol 2007; 24: 331-8.

  27. Barman P, Sengupta S, Singh S. Study of a novel method to assist in early reporting of sepsis from the microbiology laboratory. J Infect Dev Ctries 2010; 4(12): 822-7.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Invest Clin. 2012;64