Gondra JM

Language: Spanish
References: 27
Page: 212-219
PDF size: 202.54 Kb.

ABSTRACT

As a comment to Pardos’ article on “Kuhn, Wallon and the anomalies of functional psychology”, this paper reviews some inconsistencies found in the works of Wilhelm Wundt and William James. Special attention is paid to those concerning the mind-body problem and the definition and methods as well, to conclude that psychology as a science was problematic since its very beginnings.

REFERENCES

1. Brentano, F. (1874). Psychologie vom empirischen standpunkte. Leipzig, Germany: Duncker und Humbolt.

2. Croce, P. (2010). Reaching beyond uncle William: A century of William James theory and life. History of Psychology, 13, 351-377

3. Danzinger, K. (1979). The positivist repudiation of Wundt. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 15, 205-230.

4. Danzinger, K. (1980). On the threshold of the new psychology: Situating Wundt and James. En W. Bringmann & R. D. Tweney (Eds.), Wundt Studies (pp. 363-379). Toronto, Canada: Hogrefe.

5. Danziger, K. (1983). Origins and basic principles of Wundt’s Völkerpsychologie. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 303– 313.

6. Danzinger, K. (2001). The unknown Wundt: Drive, apperception and volition. En R. W. Rieber & D. Robinson (Eds.), Wilhelm Wundt in history (pp. 95-120). Nueva York, EUA: Kluwer/Plenum.

7. Greenwood, J. (2003). Wundt, völkerpsychologie, and experimental social psychology. History of Psychology, 6, 70–88.

8. James, W. (1890/1989). Principios de psicología. México, D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

9. James, W. (1892). A plea for psychology as a ‘natural science’. Philosophical Review, 1, 146-154.

10. James, W. (1892/1984). Psychology: Briefer course. Cambridge, Ma: Harvard University Press.

11. James, W. (1902/1986). Las variedades de la experiencia religiosa. Barcelona, España: Península.

12. James W. (1907/1975). Pragmatism. Cambridge, MA, EUA: Harvard University.

13. James, W. (1909/1977). A pluralistic universe. Cambridge, MA, EUA: Harvard University.

14. Külpe, O. (1893). Grundriss der psychologie. Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.

15. Lamberth, D. C. (1999). William James and the metaphysics of experience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.

16. Nerlich, B. & Clarke, D. (1998). The linguistic repudiation of Wundt. History of Psychology, 1, 179-204.

17. Pardos, A. (2011). Kuhn, Wallon y las anomalías de la psicología funcional. Revista Mexicana de Investigación en Psicología, 3(2), 182-202.

18. Richardson, R. (Ed.). (2010). The heart of William James. Cambridge, MA, EUA: Harvard University Press.

19. Titchener, E.B. (1898). The postulates of a structural psychology. Philosophical Review, 7, 449-465

20. Vila, I. (1986). Introducción a la obra de Henry Wallon. Barcelona: Anthropos.

21. Wallon, H. (1942/1978). Del acto al pensamiento. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Psique.

22. Watson, J.B. (1913/1996). La psicología tal como la ve el conductista. En J. M. Gondra (Ed.), La psicología moderna (pp. 400-414). Bilbao, España: Desclée de Brouwer.

23. Wundt, W. (1862). Beiträge zur theorie der sinneswahrnehmung. Leipzig, Germany: C. F. Winter.

24. Wundt, W. (1874). Grundzüge der physiologischen psychologie. Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.

25. Wundt, W. (1896). Grundriss del psychologie. Lepizig, Germany: Engelmann.

26. Wundt, W. (1896/1996). Objeto, divisiones y método de la psicología. En J. M. Gondra (Ed.), La psicología moderna (pp. 181-196). Bilbao, España: Desclée de Brouwer.

27. Wundt, W. (1900/1920). Völkerpsychologie (Vols. 1–10). Leipzig, Germany: Engelmann.