medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Ginecología y Obstetricia de México

Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 08

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2013; 81 (08)

Laparoscopic hysterectomy as first-line procedure in the treatment of women with benign uterine

Noguera-Sánchez MF, Briones- Garduño JC, Rabadán-Martínez CE, Antonio-Sánchez P, Bautista-Gómez EJ, Ceja-Sánchez JM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 448-453
PDF size: 499.64 Kb.


Key words:

Laparoscopic, hysterectomy, Urban Hospital, safe management.

ABSTRACT

Background: It is estimated that a total of 600,000 abdominal hysterectomies, vaginal and laparoscopic there are performed in USA, these figures make the hysterectomy the first ranked surgery. In our country, since the first description of the technique in 1989, laparoscopic hysterectomy (HL) has developed and evolved. However, the learning curve for mastering this procedure results in larger and more complex complications than other approaches.
Material and method: Retrospective, longitudinal and descriptive study were carried out, the collection of data took place from the clinical records of patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy during January 1, 2007 through December 31 of the same year. It was performed in women older than 18 years with benign uterine pathology. Body mass index greater than 30 Kg/m2, uterus greater than 16 weeks of gestational age or more than 500 grams, illnesses than compromise life of patients o women that did not return to post-surgical evaluation were excluded.
Results: There were performe 75 laparoscopic hysterectonies, 72 underwent without any complication. The average hospital stay was 3 days. We founded 3 major surgical complications, a case of bleeding from the surgical area that was immediately attended by laparoscopic VicrilMR -00 single stitching. Also were founded 2 urinary lesions: 1 complex lesion of the trigonous. The follow up of this case was torpid it were needed to derivate for 15 day with a latex foley catheter after the secondary repair and was unsuccessfully. Thereafter a urogynecological team programed laparotomy for the final fistulectomy. And the third case of accident was referred to a ureteral section, was diagnosed by the leaking at opaquedye from the abdominal x ray, and the patient was programed to laparotomy to performed a termino-terminal anastomosis.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic hysterectomy is a reliable treatment option for benign uterine pathology. We believe that this surgical technique should be offered as the regular way to perform the hysterectomy.


REFERENCES

  1. Sutton C. Past, present and future of hysterectomy. J Minimally Invasive Gynecol 2010;17:421-435.

  2. Cortés-Flores R, López-Vera EA, Hortiales-Laguna OI, Ramírez-Reyna JL, González-Díaz OA, Ramírez-Sánchez LF. Histerectomía total laparoscópica: resultados en un hospital de tercer nivel de atención. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2012;80:327-331.

  3. Reich H, De Caprio J, Mac Glynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynecol Surg 1989;5:213.

  4. Donnez O, Jadoul P, Squifflet J, Donnez J. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures. BJOG 2009;116:492- 500.

  5. Neiboer T, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;CD003677. Disponible en http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858. CD003677.pub3/abstract

  6. Murillo IJM, Pedraza GLA, Aguirre OX, López GPE. Histerectomía por laparoscopia: experiencia de 10 años en el Hospital Español de México. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2007;75:667-677.

  7. Morgan OF, López ZMA, Elorriaga GE, Soto PM, Lelevier RH. Histerectomía total laparoscópica: complicaciones y evolución clínica en una serie de 87 casos. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2008;76:520-525.

  8. Ayala-Yáñez R, Briones-Landa C, Anaya-Coeto H, Leroy-López L, Zavaleta-Salazar R. Histerectomía total laparoscópica: estudio descriptivo de la experiencia institucional con 198 casos. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2010;78:605-611.

  9. Hoffman C, Kennedy J, Borschel L, Burchette R, Kidd A. Laparoscopic hysterectomy: The Kaiser Permanente San Diego Experience. J Minimally Invasive Gynecol 2005;12:67-69.

  10. Cipullo L, De Paoli S, Fasolino L, Fasolino A. Laparoscopic total hysterectomy compared to total hysterectomy. JSLS 2009;13:370-375.

  11. Bonilla D, Mains L, Rice J, Crawford B. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy: our 5-year experience (1998-2002). The Ochsner Journal 2010;10:8-12.

  12. Janssen P, Brolmann H, Huirne J. Recommendations to prevent urinary tract injuries during laparoscopic hysterectomy: a systematic Delphi procedure among experts. J Minimally Invasive Gynecol 2011;18: 314-321.

  13. Makinen J, Johansson J, Tomás C, Tomás E, et al. Morbidity of 10,110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod 2001;16:1473-1478.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2013;81