medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Investigación en Psicología

Órgano Oficial del Sistema Mexicano de Investigación en Psicología (SMIP)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Invest Psic 2011; 3 (2)

About act and content in contemporary psychology

Vila J
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 229-231
PDF size: 166.81 Kb.


Key words:

Wallon, act, thought, comparative psychology, psychology of learning.

ABSTRACT

In accordance with Pardos’s article (2011), the present paper provides some comments about the distinction between act and thought raised by Wallon and the misconceptions that have arisen. These comments also make a reflection about the contribution of the theoretical bodies of the psycholgy of learning and comparative cognition. While both still maintaining in their original approaches the act-thought distinction, they are now highly developed theoretical approaches with empirical coherence not only among themselves but with the neurosciences.


REFERENCES

  1. Blaisdell, A. P., Sawa, K., Leising, K. J., & Waldmann, M. R. (2006). Causal reasoning in rats. Science, 17(311), 1020– 1022.

  2. Domjan, M. (2010). Principios de aprendizaje y conducta. México, D.F.: Wadsworth CENAGAGE Learning Editores.

  3. Gazzaniga, M. S. (2009). The cognitive neurosciences. EUA: The MIT Press.

  4. Pearce, J. M. (2008). Animal learning & cognition. Nueva York, EUA: Psychology Press.

  5. Pardos, A. (2011). Kuhn, Wallon y las anomalías de la psicología funcional. Revista Mexicana de Investigación en Psicología, 3(2), 182-202.

  6. Pilley, J. W. & Alliston, R. K. (2011). Border collie comprehends object names as verbal referents. Behavioural Processes, 86, 184-195.

  7. Raby, C. R. & Clayton N.S (2009). Prospective cognition in animals. Behavioural Processes, 80, 314-324.

  8. Rescorla, R. A. (1992). Hierarchical asssociative relations in pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 66-70.

  9. Ribes, E. (2009). La psicología como ciencia básica. ¿Cuál es su universo de investigación? Revista Mexicana de Investigación en Psicología, 1(2), 7-19.

  10. Salwiczek, L. H., Watanabe A., & Clayton N. S. (2010). Ten years of research into avian models of episodic-like memory and its implications for developmental and comparative cognition. Behavioral Brain Research, 215, 221-234.

  11. Shettleworth, S. J. (2010) Cognition evolution and behavior, 2da edición. Nueva York, EUA: Oxford University Press.

  12. Skinnner, B. F. (1990). Can psychology be a science of mind? American Psychologist, 45, 1206-1210.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Invest Psic. 2011;3