medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Elec Psic Izt 2013; 16 (3)

Epistemic foundations to approaching to “disability” as an identity of difference historically produced

Cúpich ZJ, Paredes MM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 1056-1074
PDF size: 214.55 Kb.


Key words:

Psychoanalysis, Disability, Inclusion, Integration, Difference.

ABSTRACT

Psychoanalysis poses a sui generis of the human eye. The Freudian inquiries about the knowledge of biological, social, historic, etc. inspired to rethink the status of disabled body and mind. It is our purpose deconstruct historically speeches that established the term disability as qualifying and discriminatory regard and relate to the difference. We want to show other perspectives that fertilizing with new questions and launching new looks and unknowns to the problems of special education, integration and Inclusion in its relationship with the 'disabilities'. We consider that integration and inclusion named, so refer to the paradigms of a great positivity, mask the artificial opposition between the desirable and the abject; the term disability refers by his radical - dis-, to an alteration, problem, or involvement of the capacity that is product of a historic building, it is a term that connotes a negative sense and which necessarily refers to an individual, person, subject; It is hardly referred to disability in the animal or plant kingdoms. Therefore and input the term disability ago cufflink with a subject that gives it a position of emergency, by a difference that awarded a separation of origin in relation to others.


REFERENCES

  1. Benjamin, W. (2005). Tesis sobre la Historia y otros Fragmentos. México: Contrahistorias.

  2. Butler, J. (2002). Cuerpos que importan: sobre los límites materiales y discursivos del sexo. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

  3. Echeverría, B. (2001) Definición de la Cultura. México: ITACA y UNAM.

  4. Freud, S. (1923-1922). Dos artículos de enciclopedia. En: Obras completas, tomo XVIII, Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

  5. Foucault, M. (1967). Historia de la locura en la época clásica. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

  6. Foucault, M. (1968). Las palabras y las cosas. México: Siglo XXI.

  7. Foucault, M. (2002). La hermenéutica del sujeto. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

  8. Heidegger, M. (1998). La época de la imagen del mundo, en: Caminos del Bosque. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

  9. Jacobo, Z. (2010). La Discapacidad como una Figura de Discriminación en la Modernidad. De la Historia a las Prácticas Vigentes. (Tesis de Doctorado en Pedagogía) México: UNAM, Facultad de Filosofía y Letras.

  10. Jacobo, Z. (2012). Las paradojas de la integración/exclusión en las prácticas educativas. Efectos de discriminación o lazo social. Buenos Aires: Noveduc.

  11. Loyden, S. H. y Sánchez, B. A. (s/f). Cuerpo. Recuperado de: www.agendadelasmujeres.com.ar/pdf/CUERPO.doc

  12. Mannoni, M. (1987). El niño, su enfermedad y los otros. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Elec Psic Izt. 2013;16