medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Enfermería Neurológica

ISSN 1870-6592 (Print)
Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía Manuel Velasco Suárez
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Enf Neurol (Mex) 2013; 12 (2)

Patient perception of how nurses’ communication at the National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery

Müggenburg MC, Nava GMG, Riveros RA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 79-83
PDF size: 156.43 Kb.


Key words:

Perception, patients, nurses, communication.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The project studies the effect of communication training for nurses. It tackles the brief description of the instrument validation results on behavior of nurses about their way of communication, observed by patients and description of findings from interviews National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery applied to patients. Material and methods: Behavior of nurses about their way of communication, observed by patients was applied to 150 patients hospitalized in National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery to validate instrument and meet patient perception; the instrument was composed of 23 items that enunciate observable behaviors on empathic understanding and respect, with five Likert-type response options forever and ever; also scales apply on understanding, respect and overall satisfaction. Factor Analysis is used in descriptive statistics and tests. Results: Behavior of nurses about their way of communication, observed by patients) is validated with KMO of .791 and Bartlett’s test with a significance of .001; we get two factors, one with eight reagents on empathic understanding as physical proximity variables, listen, transmission of mind, confidence and affection, and another with two about respect. The score of the 10 reactive patients was 42.48 EN150 obtained, show respect reagents on higher values, consistent with the scale score of respect. Values ​​that measure understanding behaviors ranged from 4.53 and 3.69, is observed statistical association between the total sum of behavior of nurses about their way of communication, observed by patients and understanding and satisfaction scales. Discussion: The validation of the behavior of nurses about their way of communication, observed by patients, which stands as alternative for evaluation of nurse-patient interaction, indicator considered in the assessment of quality of health services, the findings in patients National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery show similarities and differences with other national and international studies; offer identification of behaviors that should be maintained or modified to increase quality. Conclusions: Validation and results open an expectation in terms of evaluation and feedback of nurse-patient interaction.


REFERENCES

  1. Müggenburg C, Riveros RA. Interacción enfermera-paciente y su repercusión en el cuidado hospitalario Parte I (artículo de revisión). Enfermería Universitaria ENEO UNAM. 2012; 9 (1): 36-44.

  2. Müggenburg C, Riveros RA. Interacción enfermera-paciente y su repercusión en el cuidado hospitalario Parte II (artículo de revisión). Enfermería Universitaria ENEO UNAM. 2012; 9 (2): 6-13.

  3. Cibanal L, Arce MC, Carballal MC. Técnicas de comunicación y relación de ayuda en ciencias de la salud. Barcelona-España: Elsevier. 2010; 35-51, 81-93.

  4. Colliere MF. Promover la vida. De la práctica de las mujeres cuidadoras a los cuidados de enfermería. Madrid-España: Interamericana McGraw-Hill. 1993; pp. 19-27, 139-159, 183-191.

  5. Cossette S, Pepin J, Coté JK, Courval FP. The multidimensionality of caring: a confirmatory factor analysis of the Caring Nurse Patient Interaction Short Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2008; 61 (6): 699-710.

  6. De los Ríos JL, Sánchez SJJ. Well-being and medical recovery in the Critical Care Unit: the role of the nurse-patient interaction. Salud Mental. 2002; 25 (2): 21-31.

  7. Duffy JR, Hoskins L, Furst-Seifert. Dimensions of caring. Psychometric Evaluation the Caring assessment tool. Advances in Nursing Science. 2007; 30 (3): 235-245.

  8. Henderson V. La Naturaleza de la Enfermería. Reflexiones 25 años después. Madrid, España: McGraw-Hill Interamericana. 1994; pp. 2-20, 23-24, 34-37.

  9. Peplau H. Relaciones Interpersonales en Enfermería. Barcelona: Salvat Editores S.A.; 1990; pp. 3-35.

  10. Travelbee J. 1971; Interpersonal aspects of nursing. Philadelphia: F.A. Davis. En: Marriner A, Raile M. Modelos y Teorías de Enfermería, (6ª ed.) España: Elsevier Mosby; 2008: pp. 364-367.

  11. Watson J. Nursing: Human science and human care. Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1985; pp. 50-51.

  12. Cormier WH, Cormier S. Estrategias de Entrevista para Terapeutas. Habilidades básicas e intervenciones cognitivo-conductuales. Bilbao, España: Descleé de Brouwer S.A.; 2000; pp. 35-103.

  13. Frenk J, Ruelas E, Lara R, Arroyo G, Jiménez J. Evaluación de la calidad de los Servicios de Enfermería. Tres indicadores de aplicación hospitalaria. Secretaría de Salud. Subsecretaría de Innovación y Calidad, Dirección General de Calidad. Comisión Interinstitucional y Educación en Salud de Enfermería. México; 2003.

  14. Nava MG, Zamora P. Percepción del trato digno de los familiares de los enfermos neurológicos en el Instituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía. Enfermería Neurológica. 2010; 9 (1): 32-38.

  15. Miaofen Y, Li-Hua L. A model for testing the relationship of nursing care and patient outcomes. Nursing Economics. 2004; 22 (2): 75-80.

  16. Thomas LH, McColl E, Priest J, Bond S, Boys RJ. Newcastle Satisfaction with Nursing Scales: an instrument for quality assessments of nursing care. Quality in Health Care. 1996; 5: 67-72.

  17. Torres-Contreras CC. Percepción de la calidad del cuidado de enfermería en pacientes hospitalizados. Avances en Enfermería. 2010; 28 (2): 98-110.

  18. Duffy JR, Brewer BB, Weaver MT. Revision and psychometric properties of the caring assessment tool. Clin Nurs Res. 2010; XX (X), 1-14. doi: 10.1177/1054773810369827




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Enf Neurol (Mex). 2013;12