medigraphic.com
Federación Mexicana de Ginecología y Obstetricia, A.C.

2013, Number 12

<< Back Next >>

Ginecol Obstet Mex 2013; 81 (12)

Complete uterine ruptures

Pérez-Adán M, Álvarez-Silvares E, García-Lavandeira S, Vilouta-Romero M, Doval-Conde JL

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 716-726
PDF size: 479.42 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Background: Uterine rupture is one of the most severe Obstetric complications by high morbidity and maternal and fetal mortality.
Objectives: To review cases of uterine rupture occurred for the last five years. Release the incidence, the risk factors and maternal and fetal complications, both immediate and long term.
Methods: Retrospective cohort study including all patients who completed their gestation in the University Hospital Complex of Ourense (Spain) between 2008 and March 2013. Review all medical records of patients diagnosed with uterine rupture during this period. Statistical analysis was performed using the statistical package Epidat 3.0.
Results: We found an overall incidence of uterine rupture of 0.078 %. In patients with a previous cesarean delivery incidence rises to 0.31 %.
Conclusion: Uterine rupture is an uncommon but with high maternal fetal morbidity. The main risk factor is a trial of labor after a previous cesarean delivery.


REFERENCES

  1. ProSEGO: “Rotura uterina, 2013” (Citado 4/10/2013). Disponible en: http://www.prosego.com/docs/protocolos/ Rotura_uterina.pdf

  2. ProSEGO: “Parto vaginal tras cesárea, 2010”. (Citado 4/10/2013). Disponible en: http://www.prosego.com/ docs/protocolos/PDF_Cesarea_anterior.pdf

  3. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Panel. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development conference statement: “Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights” Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(6):1279-95.

  4. GuilleMeau, J.: “De la Grossesse et accouchement des femmes” (Citado 4/10/2013). Disponible en: http:// babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=ucm.5323755674;view =1up;seq=6

  5. Epidat 3.0 Servicio Galego de Saúde (Citado 4/10/2013) Disponible en: http://www.sergas.es/MostrarContidos_ N3_T01.aspx?IdPaxina=62713&idioma=es

  6. Calvo Pérez A: “Resultados del proyecto multicéntrico de adecuación de cesáreas urgentes y programadas/ electivas en el SNS”. (Citado 30/06/2013). Disponible en: http://www.sergas.es/Docs/EnPortada/Eventos/ ponencias_xorperiIV/5%20Resultados_multicentrico. pdf

  7. Lang, CT.; Landon, MB.: “Uterine dehiscence and rupture after previous cesarean delivery”. (Citada 6/10/2013). Disponible en: http://www.uptodate.com/contents/ uterine-dehiscence-and-rupture-after-previous-cesarean- delivery

  8. Kaczmarczyk M.; Sparén P.; Terry P.; Cnattingius S.: “Risk factors for uterine rupture and neonatal conse quences of uterine rupture: a population-based study of successive pregnancies in Sweden” BJOG 2007: 114(10): 1208 – 14.

  9. Jastrow N, Roberge S, Gauthier RJ, Laroche L, Duperron L, Brassard N, Bujold E: “Effect of birth weight on adverse obstetric outcomes in vaginal birth after cesarean delive”. Obstet Gynecol 2010 Feb; 115(2Pt1):338-43.

  10. Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Leindecker S, Varner MW et at: “Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor ofter prior cesarean delivery”. N Eng J Med 2004 16: 351 (25): 2581-9.

  11. Deborah A Wing, MD: “Cervical ripening and induction of labor in women with a prior cesarean delivery” (Citado 16/10/2013). Disponible en: http://www.uptodate. com/contents/cervical-ripening-and-induction-oflabor- in-women-with-a-prior-cesarean-delivery

  12. Jozwiak M, Dodd JM. “Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section”. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD009792. DOI: 10.1002/14651858. CD009792.pub2.

  13. Bujold E, Gauthier RJ. “Risk of uterine rupture associated with an interdelivery interval between 18 and 24 months”. Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115: 1000-6.

  14. Scott JR: “Intrapartum management of trial of labour after caesarean delivery: evidence and experience”. BJOG 2013; DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.12449.

  15. Scott JR. “Mandatory trial of labor after cesarean delivery: An alternative viewpoint”. Obstet Gynecol 1991;77:811–4.

  16. Ridgeway JJ, Weyrich DL, Benedetti TJ. “Fetal heart rate changes associated with uterine rupture”. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:506–12.

  17. Naji, O.; Wynants, L.; Smith, A.; Abdallah, Y.; Stalder, C.; Sayasneh, A.; et al.: “Predicting successful vaginal birth after Cesarean section using a model based on Cesarean scar features examined by transvaginal sonography” Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 672–678.

  18. Guntiñas, A, Armijo,O, Labarta, E, Magdaleno, F, Cabrillo, E Rotura uterina y cesárea anterior. Revisión casuística durante el periodo de 1999 a 2002 en el Hospital Universitario de La Paz. Prog Obstet Ginecol 2004; 47 (2): 69-76.

  19. Bonanno C, Clausing M, Berkowitz R. VBAC: “A medicolegal perspective. Clin Perinatol” 2011;38:217–25.

  20. Holmgren C, Scott JR, Porter TF, Esplin MS, Bardsley T. Uterine rupture with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Decision-to-delivery time and neonatal outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:725–31.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com