medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista del Hospital Juárez de México

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2013, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Hosp Jua Mex 2013; 80 (2)

Material reabsorbible en el manejo de fracturas de órbita en paciente pediátrico

Licéaga-Reyes R, Barrientos-Velázquez M, Banda-Oyervides RE
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 125-128
PDF size: 256.81 Kb.


Key words:

Reabsorbable material, internal fixation.

ABSTRACT

The titanium plates and screws are the golden standard the craniofacial fixation and their use is clearly documented and studied. Although there are disadvantages inherent to rigid fixation systems, as growing disturbing, displaced of the plate, need for a posterior removal, sensitivity to thermal changes, non union, condylar displacement, inter alia. The facial fractures in the pediatric patient has a high incidence and differences between the adult patient; in anatomy, physiology and psychological development, do the techniques in trauma management very variable for reestablish the anatomy and physiology harmonically avoiding sequels in child psychological development. Development of reabsorbable plates and screw offer to surgeon an ideal fixation system which allows an appropriate stability to achieve a better bone union, biocompatibility and avoid the use of a second intervention for its posterior withdrawal. The objective of this article is providing a comprehensive review about the management on orbital fractures in child patient and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of reabsorbing materials


REFERENCES

  1. Bell B, Kindsfater C. The use of biodegradable plates and screws to stabilize facial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 31-9.

  2. Eppley B. Use of resorbable plates and screws in pediatric facial fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 63: 385-91.

  3. Ghali G, Dreher M. Contemporary management of pediatric craniofacial injuries. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am 2004; 16: 587-94.

  4. Thoren H, Iso-Kungas P, Iuzuka T, et al. Changing trends in causes and patterns of facial fractures in children. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 318-24.

  5. Haug R, Foss J. Maxillofacial injuries in the pediatric patient. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 90: 126-34.

  6. Kolk A, Stimmer H, Klopfer, et al. High resolution magnetic resonance imaging with an orbital coil as an alternative to computed tomography scan as the primary imaging modality of pediatric orbital fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 348-56.

  7. Suuronen R, Kontio R, Ashammakhi N, et al. Bioabsorbable self-reinforced plates and screws in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Biomed Mater Eng 2004; 14(4): 517-24.

  8. Peltoniemi H, Ashammakhi N, Kontio R. The use of bioabsorbable osteofixation devices in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002; 94(1): 5-14.

  9. Laine P, Kontio R, Lindqvist C, Suuronen R. Are there any complications with reabsorbable fixation devices? A 10 year review in orthognathic surgery. Int. J Oral Maxilofac Surg 2004; 33(3): 240-4.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Hosp Jua Mex. 2013;80