medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Toxicología

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2012, Number 1

<< Back

Rev Cub de Toxicol 2012; 1 (1)

National List of Toxicology, a challenge for debate

Capote MB, Rodríguez DE, Crespo MI
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page:
PDF size: 34.78 Kb.


Key words:

discussion list, analysis, electronic discussion groups, toxicology, Cuba.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The Nacional List of Toxicology (LINATOX) was created in 2001 as a tool for facilitating communication among a group of specialists with common interests.
Objetive: to analyze the functioning of LINATOX since its foundation in March 2001 up to December 2007.
Methods: asearch and manual counting was carried out on the Server of the list so as to determine indicators such as: content and monthly average of the messages sent, distribution of the subscribers according to the institutions where they work, provinces and professions.
Results: a totality of 704 messages circulated by the list. There were 155 specialist subscribed to the list working at different institutions belonging to: investigation centers, hospitals, universities, antitoxic centers, ministeries, Community Centers for Mental Health (CCSM) and polyclinics. The provinces with higher number of subscribers were: Ciudad de la Habana, La Habana, and Camaguey. Sancti Spíritus and Las Tunas provinces did not have subscribers. According to the content, the largest numbers of messages corresponded to: news, bibliographic information, information for training, general data, clinical cases, questionaries and help request. The professions of the subscribers were: toxicologists, researchers, pharmacists, physicians, professors, veterinarians and pharmacologists.
Conclusions: LINATOX is an important means of communication, as evidenced by the results. It is necessary to find a way to encourage the professionals for debating important topics about Toxicology, in order to provide a better sense to the list.


REFERENCES

  1. Villanueva Mansilla E. Las listas de discusión en INTERNET como espacio público: un breve estudio de caso. [citado 9 Nov 2009]. Disponible en: http://www.macareo.pucp.edu.pe~evillan/espublico.html

  2. Rodríguez Camiño R. Las listas de discusión electrónicas en bibliotecología y ciencias de la información. ACIMED. 1999;7(1):15-29.

  3. Capote Marrero B, Rodríguez Durán E, Crespo Molina I, Hernández López H, Conill Díaz T. Lista Nacional de Toxicología: un puente de comunicación a su servicio. 2003 [citado 12 Aug 2010] 11(3): Disponible en:http:bvs.sld.cu/revistas/aci/vol11203/aci080203.htm

  4. Echavarría T. Encouraging research through electronic monitoring: a case study. Coll Res Libr. 1995;56(4):352-61.

  5. Bartllan J, Assouline B. A content of PUBYAC: a preliminary study. Inform Technol Libr. 1997;16(4):165-74.

  6. Merlo Vega JA, Merlo Vega MJ. Servicios de información en línea para el desarrollo local. VI Jornadas Españolas de Documentación. Valencia: ESABID; 1998. [Citado 12 Aug 2010]. Disponible en :http://www.web.usal.es/~alar/Bibweb/Temario/Automat.pdf




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cub de Toxicol. 2012;1