medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2005, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2005; 43 (6)

Evaluation of the Clinical Aptitude in Physicians of the First Level of Attention

García-Mangas JA, Viniegra-Velázquez L, Arellano-López J, García-Moreno J
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 465-472
PDF size: 147.43 Kb.


Key words:

Medical education, clinical aptitude, family medicine, educational research.

ABSTRACT

Objective: to evaluate the development through time of the clinical aptitude in physicians of the first level of attention and the influence of cate-gories of first level physicians.
Material and methods: In a cross-section design the clinical aptitude was studied in three cate-gories of physicians of the first level of attention: general practitioners with functions of family medicine, family physicians, and family physicians working as head of a clinical department in Family Medicine Units with 10 or more consulting rooms. To evaluate the clinical aptitude, an instrument with 12 real clinical cases and 412 questions was used with nine indicators; this instrument was validated in a previous study.
Results: 499 physicians of the three categories were included, the scores range was between 52 and 245, with an average of 169 (41 %). When comparing the categories of physicians, significant differences were found, in favor of the physicians with a specialty. There were no differences among heads of clinical departments and family physicians. In the global analysis among indicators no differences were found. When correlating the clinical aptitude with the years of experience, without considering the category, a correlation of 0.02 was obtained.
Conclusions: experience seems to have no influence in the development of clinical aptitude; passive continuing education seems to have little influence in the physicians deepening into frequent health-problem solving in their practice.


REFERENCES

  1. Jinich H. Prólogo. En: Carrillo FLMR. La respon-sabilidad profesional del médico. México: Porrúa; 1998.

  2. Lifshitz A. La práctica de la medicina clínica en la era tecnológica. México: UNAM-IMSS; 1999. p. 161-180.

  3. Viniegra VL. Solución de problemas cínicos. En: Laredo F, Lifshitz A. Introducción al estudio de la medicina clínica. México: Prado; 2000. p. 153-165.

  4. Jinich BH. Factores psicológicos y el aparato di-gestivo. Rev Med IMSS 2000;38(1):69-76

  5. El Pequeño Larousse Ilustrado. México: Ediciones Larousse; 2005.

  6. Narro RJ. El sentido de la medicina. En: Los desafíos de la educación médica en México. México: Uni-versidad Nacional Autónoma de México; 1990. p. 167-178.

  7. Viniegra VL. Las gestiones de las instituciones privadas y públicas de salud ¿porqué deben ser distintas? Rev Med IMSS 2004;42(1):37-53.

  8. Reiser SJ. Los defectos de la tecnología en la toma de decisiones médicas. En: La medicina y el imperio de la tecnología. México: Biblioteca de la Salud; 1990. p. 183-201.

  9. García MJA, Vinegra VL. Evaluación de la aptitud clínica en residentes de medicina familiar. Rev Med IMSS 2003;41(6):487-494.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2005;43