medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2014; 52 (5)

The use of therapeutic writing in an institutional context

Reyes-Iraola A
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 502-509
PDF size: 59.43 Kb.


Key words:

Writing, Language, Narrative therapy, Psychotherapy.

Text Extraction

Background: This article aims to explain the effect of the use of writing, in an institutional therapeutic space, as a means to achieve the therapeutic change in the patient and a greater effi ciency in time and in institutional spaces.
Methods: Different forms of using the written document are shown and supported theoretically in the context of narrative and collaborative therapy, as well as examples with the presentation of excerpts of writings of the participants. The sample was composed of patients attending the Hospital de Psiquiatría, Unidad Morelos, to receive treatment in any of the forms (commital and/or outpatient consultation).
Results: Written and oral language exchange meaning continuously, showing that the therapeutic process takes place beyond institutional and therapeutic spaces (and times). This encourages the advantages offered by the use of written language in oral psychotherapeutic processes.
Conclusion: Writing is an intellectual resource which facilitates thinking, since when we write our own experiences the events that constitutes them are organized in time. This produces a perception of change, a representation of meanings, and stimulates self-effi ciency, since it produces several stories of the events and experiences.


REFERENCES

  1. Chafe W, Tannen D. The relation between written and spoken language. Ann Rev Anthropol. 1987; 16:383-407.

  2. Goodman KS. El proceso de lectura: consideraciones a través de las lenguas y del desarrollo. En: Ferreiro E, Gómez-Palacio M, compiladoras. Nuevas perspectivas sobre los procesos de lectura y escritura. 17a ed. México, DF: Siglo XXI Editores; 2002. p. 13-28.

  3. Stubbs M. Language and literacy: The sociolinguistics of reading and writing. En White M, Epston D, editores. Medios narrativos para fi nes terapéuticos. Barcelona: Paidós; 1993. p 48-50.

  4. Tarragona-Sáez M. Escribir para re-escribir historias y relaciones. Psicoterapia y Familia. 2003;16(1):45-54.

  5. White M, Epston D. Medios Narrativos para fi nes terapéuticos. Barcelona: Paidós; 1993.

  6. Lanza-Castelli G. El trabajo de escritura entre sesiones en la psicoterapia psicoanalítica. Subjetividad y procesos cognitivos. 2006;(9):155-76.

  7. Payne M. Terapia narrativa: una introducción para profesionales. Barcelona; México: Paidós; 2002.

  8. Penn P, Frankfurt M. Client voices and relational aesthetics: A correspondence. Journal of Systemic Therapies. 1998;17(4):27-38.

  9. Penn P, Frankfurt M. La creación de un texto participante: la escritura, las voces múltiples y la multiplicidad narrativa. En: Limón Arce G, compilador. Terapias postmodernas: aportaciones construccion istas. México, DF: Pax; 2005. p. 85-106.

  10. Muñoz A. El arte como terapia. Cepvi. 2007; p. 1-7. Disponible en http:/www.cepvi.com/artículos/arte7. smtml.

  11. Lanza-Castelli G. Lo difícil de decir en sesión. Su mediación a través de la escritura. Psicoterapia.com. 2008;1-16. Disponible en http://www.depsicoterapias. com/articulo.asp?IdArticulo=398

  12. Reyes-Iraola A. Postura y ejercicio ético de orientadores familiares y terapeutas familiares en un servicio de emergencia telefónica. Psicoterapia y Familia. 2009;22(1):39-55.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2014;52