medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica Electrónica

ISSN 1684-1824 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Méd Electrón 2014; 36 (4)

The membership of the Medical Ethics commissions

Cañete VR, Brito PK, Valerio ULD, Marcel SK, Valdés VR
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 493-498
PDF size: 30.67 Kb.


Key words:

commissions, medical ethics, membership.

ABSTRACT

People have the rights to an equitable, effective and attentive care of their health, and the society, in the whole, must assure that nobody will be excluded to access the health care services, and that these services provide a qualitative care. Medical Ethics Commissions should support the managing organs, contributing that way to increase the population´s health status and to the population´s satisfaction with the services they receive. Ministerial Resolution Nr 138, issued by the Ministry of Public Health in 2009, empowered the commissions with a juridical tool facilitating their functions. The correct interpretation of the resolution and its timely application are key elements in the advisement they should carry out. In a new intent to eradicate doubts still existent among health professionals about the Medical Ethics commissions, we carried out this term. Besides that, we were especially interested in contributing to the existence of a space about bioethic themes.


REFERENCES

  1. Report of the International Bioethics Committee of UNESCO (IBC) on Social Responsability and Health. Social and Human Sciences Sector Division of Ethics of Science and Technology, Bioethics Section. SHS/EST/CIB10-11/1. UNESCO; 2010.

  2. Domínguez-Alonso E, Zacca E. Sistema de salud de Cuba. Salud Pública Mex [Internet]. 2011 [citado 19 Ene 2014];53 supl 2:S168-76. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?pid=S0036- 36342011000800012&script=sci_arttext

  3. Cañete R, Prior A, Brito K, Guilhem D, Novaes MR, Goodman KW. Development of an institutional curriculum in ethics and public health. Acta Bioeth [Internet]. 2013 [citado 19 Ene 2014];19(2):251-7. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.cl/pdf/abioeth/v19n2/art09.pdf

  4. Cañete Villafranca R, Damián Valerio Urgelles L. Las reuniones de las comisiones de ética médica. Rev Méd Electrón [Internet]. 2014 Ene-Feb [citado 19 Ene 2014];36(1). Disponible en: http://www.revmatanzas.sld.cu/revista%20medica/ano%202014/vol1%202014/te ma11.htm

  5. Bleakley A, Bligh J. Who can resist Foucault? J Med Philos. 2009; 34(4):368-83. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 19549725.

  6. UNESCO. Funcionamiento de los comités de bioética: procedimientos y políticas. Ginebra: UNESCO; 2006.

  7. Florida Bioethics Networks. FBN Guidelines for Ethics Committees. Miami: FBN; 2011.

  8. Byerly WG. Working with the institutional review board. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009;66(2):176-84. Citado en PubMed; PMID: 19139484.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Méd Electrón. 2014;36