medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Radiología, México

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2002, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Anales de Radiología México 2002; 1 (4)

The Radiologic report in Mastography by the BI-RADS system

Ortíz IMC, García NF, Díes SP, Ponte RR, Sánchez CJ, Barreda ER
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 573-576
PDF size: 177.09 Kb.


Key words:

No keywords

ABSTRACT

The BI-RADS System was first published by the American College of Radiology in 1993 and its use was standarized in 1995.
On April 2001, the Mexican “Diario Oficial de la Federacion” published by the mexican governement recommends this system to be used on all mammogram reports.
It includes six categories: Type 0, incomplete study; Type 1, negative for malignancy; Type 2, Benign findings. Routine mammogram is recommended; Type 3, Probably benign. Six months follow up is recommended; Type 4, low probability of malignancy. Should undergo biopsy. And, Type 5, high probability of malignancy.


REFERENCES

  1. American College of Radiology: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 3rd ed. Reston, Va. ACR 1998

  2. Orel, Susan, et. Al BI-RADS Categorization As a Predictor of Malignancy. Radiology 1999; 211: 845-850

  3. Basset, Lawrence W. Imaging of Breast Masses. Radiol Clin. Of North America Vol 38 No4:669-691, jul 2000 Referencias 576 Anales de Radiología México

  4. Heilbrunn Ken S. The American College of Radiology’s Mammography Lexicon: Barking up the wrong tree? AJR 1994; 162: 593-594

  5. Caplan LS, Blackman, et al. Coding Mammograms using the Classification “probably benign finding-short interval follow-up suggested” AJR 1999 feb;172(2): 339-42

  6. Sickles Edward. Management of Probably Benign Breast Lesions. Radiol Clin of North America Vol 33 No.6 nov 1995

  7. Monsees Barbara. Evaluation of Breast Microcalcifications Radiol Clin of North America Vol 33 No 6 Nov 1995

  8. Kerlikowske K, et al Variability and Accuracy in Mammographic Interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Jnat Cancer Inst 1998 Dec2;90 (23):1801-9

  9. Berube M, et al. Level of Suspicion of a Mammographic lesion: use of features defined by BI-RADS lexicon and correlation with core biopsy. Can Assoc Radiol J 1998 Aug;49(4): 223-8

  10. Liberman L., et al. The BI-RADS: positive Predictive Value of Mammographic Features and Final Asessment Categories. AJR 1998 Jul;171(1): 35-40




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Anales de Radiología México. 2002;1