medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Medicina de la Reproducción

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2014, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Med Repro 2014; 6.7 (2)

Modified natural cycle in in vitro fertilization: an option to infertile couples

Velázquez-Fonseca J, Regalado-Hernández MÁ, Sondó-García ZG, Moreno-García JD
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 96-101
PDF size: 532.80 Kb.


Key words:

modified natural cycles, in vitro fertilization.

ABSTRACT

Were recorded important changes in the world of assisted reproduction. Due to the technological innovation in laboratories of gametes, the demand of in vitro fertilization and the research of improvements on care of infertile couples, the schemes of natural and modified natural cycles have benefited the safety of patients, have improved the endometrial receptivity and have reduced the cost of treatment. Thus, the opening for offering a higher possibility of success related to the pregnancy rate demands reconsidering in the techniques of assisted reproduction.


REFERENCES

  1. Pelinck MJ, Hoek A. Efficacy of natural cycle IVF: a review of the literature. Hum Reprodu Update 2002;8:129-139.

  2. Matsuura T, Takehara Y. Natural IVF cycles may be desirable for women with repeated failures by stimulated IVF cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 2008;25:163-167.

  3. Edwards RG. IVF, IVM, natural cycle IVF, minimal stimulation IVF-time for a rethink. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2007;15:106-119.

  4. Ferraretti A, Goossens V, et al: European IVF Monitoring (EIM), Consortium for European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod 2013;28:2318-2331.

  5. Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson G. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technology (ICMART) and the World Health Organization (WHO) revised glossary of ART terminology 2009. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1520-1524.

  6. Veeck L. An atlas of human gametes and conceptuses. Parthenon Publishing, 1999.

  7. Baart EB, Macklon NS. Ovarian stimulation and embryo quality. Reprod Biomed Online 2009;45-50.

  8. Aanesen A, Nygren KG. Modified natural cycle IVF and mild IVF: a 10 year Swedish experience. Reprod Biomed Online 2010;156-162.

  9. Mejía C, Moreno G. Primer embarazo logrado por ciclo natural modificado en una paciente baja respondedora en el Centro Médico Nacional 20 de Noviembre, ISSSTE. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2010;78:617-620.

  10. Martínez-Conejero JA, Simon C, et al. Is ovarian stimulation detrimental to the endometrium? Reprod Biomed Online 2007;15:45-50.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Med Repro. 2014;6.7