medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cardiología

ISSN 0188-2198 (Print)
En 2019, la Revista Mexicana de Cardiología cambió a Cardiovascular and Metabolic Science

Ver Cardiovascular and Metabolic Science


  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cardiol 2015; 26 (1)

Pronostic value of the central aortic systolic pressure measured with the analysis of pulse wave en patients with acute coronary syndrome and systemic hypertension

Rodríguez-Steffani EA, Corona-Tapia A, Borrayo-Sánchez G
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 16-27
PDF size: 206.55 Kb.


Key words:

Central aortic systolic pressure, acute coronary syndrome, high blood pressure.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: In Mexico, ischemic heart disease is a major cause of death and representing 18% of all deaths per year, approximately 45% of these patients have arterial hypertension and 20% have less control of their figures tension. The CASP measurement by analysis of the pulse wave is associated with more adverse than the single blood pressure measurement events. At present there are no studies on the subject, in patients diagnosed with ACS. Objective: To evaluate the prognosis of measuring the Central Aortic Systolic Pressure by radial CASP as a risk factor in hypertensive patients with ACS. Material and methods: This is a cohort study in patients admitted to the Inpatient Units, diagnosed with ACS according to international criteria (ACC/AHA/ESC) who underwent measurement of CASP by analyzing pulse wave and Augmentation Index (RAI) using BPro device in patients with and without arterial hypertension. CASP and RAI was measured using a scale expected by age and gender two groups according to the normality of the CASP, cardiovascular events (death, re-infarction, cerebrovascular events, functional class and need new hospitalizations were identified ) were evaluated during hospitalization and one-month follow-up. Results: We included 150 patients in the study, 105 hypertensive patients (group A) and 45 non-hypertensive patients (group B) and 50 controls (group C). The average age of the patients was 62.6 years, 78% male gender, other risk factors were distributed as follows: 52% smoking, diabetes, dyslipidemia 39.8 and 42%. The mean baseline heart rate was 73 bpm. A statistically significant difference in the numbers of diastolic blood pressure (73 with 78 mmHg, p = 0.014) was found. The average value of the CASP for each group was 102.5 ± 10.1 mmHg in controls, 107.8 ± 16.1 mmHg in normotensive and 118 ± 14.7 mmHg in hypertensive, with a significant difference (p ‹ 0.0001). 53% of hypertensive patients had an abnormal CASP with respect to age and gender compared to normotensive subjects (35%) and healthy controls (22%). The incidence of MACE at 7 and 30 days was higher in the hypertensive group (p ‹ 0.0001). Patients with abnormal CASP regardless of whether or not hypertension had a higher rate of adverse events during hospitalization (RR 2.7, 95% CI 1.38-5.45, p = 0.003) and at 30 days follow-up (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.1 -4.2, p = 0.018). Conclusions: The arterial hypertension is a risk factor for developing a CASP outside the normal range for age and gender compared with non-hypertensive patients and healthy controls. Our findings demonstrate for the first time in Mexico that measuring central aortic systolic pressure calculated by the radial CASP can be used as an independent predictor of major cardiovascular events 7 and 30 days in patients with ACS, which we consider to be assessed in these patients.


REFERENCES

  1. 2011 WHO’s anual compilation of data from its 193 Member States, including a summary of progress towards the healt-relatead Millenium Development Goals and Targets.

  2. World Health Organization. The Atlas of Heart Disease and Stroke. World Health Organization; 2008.

  3. Kenneth D, Kochanek MA, Jiaquan X, Sherry L, Murphy BS, Arialdi M et al. Deaths: Preliminary Data for 2009. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2011; 59 (4): 1-51.

  4. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2008 Update. 2008.

  5. Etemad LR, McCollam PI. Total first-year costs of acute coronary syndrome in a managed care setting. J Manag Care Pharm. 2005; 11 (4): 300-306.

  6. Leal J, Luengo-Fernández R, Gray A, Petersen S, Rayner M. Economic burden of cardiovascular disease in the enlarged European Union. Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 1610-1619.

  7. Programa Nacional de Salud 2007-2012. Secretaría de Salud de México. Primera Edición 2007.

  8. Encuesta Nacional de Salud y Nutrición (ENSANUT) 2006.

  9. www.inegi.gob.mx Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática. Epidemiología de la defunción poblaciponal. México: INEGI; 2010.

  10. Borrayo-Sánchez G, Madrid-Miller A, Arriaga-Nava R, Ramos-Corrales MA, García-Aguilar J, Almeida-Gutiérrez E. Riesgo estratificado de los síndromes coronarios agudos. Resultados del primer RENASCA-IMSS. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2010; 48 (3): 259-264.

  11. Rosas PM, Lara EA, Pastelín HG, Velázquez MO, Méndez OA, Lorenzo NJ et al. Re-encuesta Nacional de Hipertensión Arterial (RENAHTA): Consolidación Mexicana de los Factores de Riesgo Cardiovascular. Cohorte Nacional de Seguimiento. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2005; 75 (1): 96-111.

  12. Isordia-Salas I, Santiago-Germán D, Rodríguez-Navarro H, Almaráz-Delgado M, Leaños-Miranda A, Borrayo-Sánchez G et al. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome components in an urban mexican sample: comparison between two classifications. Exp Diabetes Res. 2012; 2012: 202540.

  13. Nair D, Tan SY, Gan HW, Lim SF, Tan J, Zhu M et al. The use of ambulatory tonometric radial arterial wave capture to measure ambulatory blood pressure: the validation of a novel wrist-bound device in adults. J Hum Hypertension. 2007; 8: 1-3.

  14. Williams B. Measurement of ambulatory central aortic pressure in clinical trials using the bpro device. August 2008.

  15. Williams B, Lacy P, Thom S, Cruickshank K, Stanton A, Collier D et al. The CAFE investigators, for the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) Investigators. Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes. Principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) Study. Circulation. 2006; 113: 1213-1225.

  16. Wang JG, Staessen JA, Franklin SS, Fagard R, Gueyffier F. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure lowering as determinants of cardiovascular outcome. Hypertension. 2005; 495: 907-913.

  17. Benetos A, Rudnichi A, Safar M, Guize L. Pulse pressure and cardiovascular mortality in normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Hypertension. 1998; 32: 560-564.

  18. Blacher J, Guerin AP, Pannier B, Marchais SJ, Safar ME, London GM. Impact of aortic stiffness on survival in end-stage renal disease. Circulation. 1999; 99: 2434-2439.

  19. Romann M, Devereux R, Kizer J, Lee E, Galloway J, Ali T et al. Central pressure more strongly relates to vascular disease and outcome than does braquial pressure. The Strong Heart Study. Hypertension. 2007; 50: 197-203.

  20. Iñiguez K, Borrayo G, Almeida E, Madrid A, Isordia I, Jáuregui R et al. Correlación entre la presión central aórtica medida a través del análisis de onda de pulso radial y la presión sistólica a nivel de la raíz de la aorta en paciente sometidos a cateterismo cardiaco. Rev Mex Cardiol. 2010; 21 (4): 161-215.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cardiol. 2015;26