Blanco AMÁ, Hernández AO, Llibre GJJ, Viera MC, Cruillas MS, Méndez RA

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 205-217
PDF size: 174.65 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: there is a plan of residents of Internal Medicine. This plan includes theoretical tests with question of large answers.
Objective: to propose general criteria of assessment to large answer questions for Internal Medicine's residents belong to the Faculty of Medical Sciences "Finlay-Albarrán".
Material and methods: we made a technological development's research in two stages: the first one belonging to creation of general criteria of assessment of the questions; the second one of validation. Information appears in charts of the results and their interpretations are in the content of the discussion.
Results: the main questions were about the behavior following by the positive diagnoses. The more frequent problems of health were infective disease and chronic illnesses. The most relevant quality indicators of answers were the completing, physiopathology’s elements, and the student’s oral expression, the management of the researching results, the updated information and the organization of the answer.
Conclusions: it was established a proposal of the general criteria of evaluation for Internal Medicine's residents belong to the Faculty of Medical Science "Finlay- Albarrán", in order to increase the level of assimilation by means of questions about conceptual or clinical problems.

REFERENCES

1. Espinosa Brito A. Medicina interna ¿qué fuiste, qué eres, qué serás? Rev. Cubana Med. 1999; 38(1): 79- 90.

2. Reyes BH ¿Qué es Medicina Interna? Rev. Med. Chile. 2006; 134: 1338-1344.

3. Zacca Peña E. Anuario Estadístico de Salud 2010. Dirección Nacional de Registros Médicos y Estadísticas de Salud. La Habana. 2011; 27- 91.

4. Zapatero Gaviria A, Barba Martín R, Canora Lebrato J, Losa García JE, Plaza Canteli S, Marco Martínez J, et al. Mortalidad en los servicios de medicina interna. Med Clin (Barc). 2010; 134: 6-12.

5. Salas Perea RS. Educación en salud. Competencia y desempeño profesionales. Ciudad de La Habana: Editorial de Ciencias Médicas; 1999.

6. Buckley BS, Manalo M, Lapitan MCM. Medical Interns’ Knowledge and Training Regarding Urethral Catheter Insertion and Insertion Trelated Urethral Injuries in Male Patients. BMC Medical Education. 2011; 11(1): 73.

7. Peña A. Filosofía, medicina y razonamiento clínico. Med Clin (Barc). 2011;136(14):633-636.

8. Sánchez Rodríguez A. El enfermo con pluripatología: la necesidad de una atención integral coordinada. Med Clin (Barc). 2005; 125(1):12-3.

9. Montero Ruiz E, López Álvarez J. La interconsulta médica: problemas y soluciones. Med Clin (Barc). 2011; 136(11): 488-490.

10. Lifshitz A. La validación de los signos clínicos. Med Intern Mex. 2002; 18(2): 65-6.

11. Blanco Aspiazu MA, Suárez Bergado R, Fernández Camejo J, González Pérez JL, Ramírez Chávez J. Algunas reflexiones sobre el problema diagnóstico en clínica. Educ Med Super [revista en la Internet]. 2009, Dic.; 23(4): 238-244. [Citado 2014 Abr 03]; . Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext &pid=S0864-21412009000400009&lng=es.

12. Bordage G. Elaborated knowledge: a key to successful diagnostic thinking. Acad Med. 1994; 69: 883-85.

13. Galperin PY. Introducción a la Psicología. Ciudad de La Habana: Editorial Pueblo y Educación; 1982.

14. De Bruin HBA, Schmidt GH, Rikers RMJP. The Role of Basic Science Knowledge and Clinical Knowledge in Diagnostic Reasoning: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Acad Med. 2005; 80: 765-773.

15. Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Boshuizen HPA. A cognitive theory on medical expertise: theory and implications. Acad Med. 1990; 65: 611- 21.

16. Newble DI, Baxter A, Elmslie RG. A comparison of multiple-choice tests and free-response tests in examinations of clinical competence. Med Educ. 1979, 13(4): 263–268.