medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia

ISSN 2395-9215 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Facultad de Odontología de la UNAM
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2015, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Ortodon 2015; 3 (4)

Variations in slot size of self-ligating brackets

Lugo AMD, Ruiz DR, Marichi RF, Padilla OS
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 7
Page: 224-227
PDF size: 287.14 Kb.


Key words:

Slot, brackets, self-ligating.

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to assess four different self-ligating bracket designs to determine which has the most accurate slot dimensions in the 0.022” dimension. Forty brackets of four different self-ligating bracket designs (Damon 3, Damon 3 MX, InOvation, Forestadent) were randomly selected. The brackets were measured at the slot height 2 times on each side, in the internal portion of the slot and in its most external portion using a Nikon Profile Projector model V-16D. The mean value of the slot height measurement at the internal portion was for Damon 3 brackets: 0.02332” ± 0.00030”; for Damon 3 MX, 0.02305” ± 0.00040”; for InOvation, 0.02264” ± 0.00032”, and for Forestadent, 0.02341” ± 0.00032”. At the height measurement in the outer portion of the slot, the mean value for Damon 3 was 0.02333” ± 0.00038”; for Damon 3 MX, 0.02337” ± 0.00044”; for InOvation, 0.02295” ± 0.00032”; and for Forestadent, 0.02345” ± 0.00025”. The slot walls in the Damon bracket were parallel and in the other three self-ligating bracket designs, they were divergent. The results showed that there were statistically significant differences in terms of internal and external slot dimensions of the four different designs of self-ligating brackets (p ‹ 0.05).


REFERENCES

  1. Gioka C, Eliades T. Materials-induced variation in the torque expression of preadjusted appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 125: 323-328.

  2. Kapur-Wadhwa R. Physical and mechanical properties affecting torque control. J Clin Orthod. 2004; 38: 335-340.

  3. Owen AH. Torque in the base versus torque in the face. J Clin Orthod. 1991; 25: 608-610.

  4. Siatkowski RE. Loss of anterior torque control due to variations in bracket slot and archwire dimensions. J Clin Orthod. 1999; 33: 508-510.

  5. Kusy RP, Whitley JQ. Assessment of second-order clearances between orthodontic archwires and bracket slots via the critical contact angle for binding. Angle Orthod. 1999; 69: 71-80.

  6. Cash AC, Good SA, Curtis RV, McDonald F. An evaluation of slot size in orthodontic brackets-are standards as expected? Angle Orthod. 2004; 74: 450-453.

  7. Thorstenson GA, Kusy RP. Effect of archwire size and material on the resistance to sliding of self-ligating brackets with second-order angulation in the dry state. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2002; 122: 295-305.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Ortodon. 2015;3