medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Clínica de la Escuela de Medicina de la Universidad de Costa Rica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Clin Esc Med 2016; 6 (1)

Manejo de masas anexiales

Mora DM, del Valle SR
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 129-133
PDF size: 890.55 Kb.


Key words:

Masa anexial, cáncer de ovario, quistes de ovario, ultrasonografía, quiste ovario, ca-125, HE4.

ABSTRACT

The management of an adnexal mass focuses primarily in ruling out the risk of malignancy and defining treatment. The diagnosis is based on ultrasound findings, as well as risk factors and age of the patient. An adnexal mass at low risk of malignancy will be managed conservative by observation or by laparoscopic surgery, while a mass at moderate or high risk of malignancy should be addressed surgically, via laparotomy in the majority of cases.


REFERENCES

  1. Liu JH, Zanotti KM. Management of the Adnexal Mass. ObstetGynecol 2011; 117: 1413-1428. 12.

  2. Ben- AwiLSmorgick N Tovbin J Fuchs N HalperinRPansky M. Does intraoperative spillage of benign ovarian mucinous cystoadenoma increase its recurrence rate? ObstetGynecol 2010; 202(2): 142.e1-5.

  3. Gallo Vallejo JL. Conservación de los ovarios frente a ooforectomía bilateral en pacientes sometidas a histerectomía por procesos benignos. ClinInvest Gin Obstet 2009; 36(3): 94-98.

  4. Nezhat C Cho J King LP Hajhosseini B Nezhat F. Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses. ObstetGynecolClin North Am. 2011; 38(4): 663-676.

  5. Canis M Abischong B Houlle C Botchorishvili R Jardon K Safi A, et al. Laparoscopic management of adnexal masses: a gold standard? CurrOpinObstetGynecol 2002; 14: 423-428.

  6. Alejandra catalanB Domingo LaizRJaimeCorvalanDiegomeosliWladi mirVasquez. Manejo laparoscópico de masa anexiales. Revista Chilena de Obstetricia y Ginecologia 200570(4): 231-235

  7. Moore Richard G Miller M Disilvestro P Landrum L Gajewski, W Ball J et al. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm in Women With a Pelvic Mass, Obstetrics &Gynecology:August 2011 - Volume 118 - Issue 2, Part 1 - pp 280- 288,

  8. Givens VMitchelGHarraway-smith C Reddy A David l. Diagnosis and Managementof Adnexal Masses. 2009 American Academy of FamilyPhysicians, October 15, 2009 Volume 80, Number 8: P815-820.

  9. McDonald JM1 Doran S DeSimone CP UelandFRDePriest PD Ware RA et al.Predicting risk of malignancy in adnexal masses.Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Apr;115(4):687-94.

  10. Van den Akker PA1 Aalders AL Snijders MP Kluivers KB Samlal RA Vollebergh JH Massuger LF. Evaluation of the Risk of Malignancy Index in daily clinical management of adnexal masses. GynecolOncol. 2010 Mar;116(3):384-8.

  11. Zavaleta-Landa JM Sanchez, JGutierrez.DLMartines.D. Característicasultrasonograficas benignas y malignas de masas anexiales. RevInvMed Sur Mex, Abril-Junio 2013; 20(2): 130-132




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Clin Esc Med. 2016;6