medigraphic.com
SPANISH

MediSur

ISSN 1727-897X (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Medisur 2016; 14 (2)

Ranking of cuban medical journals according to the Google Scholar H5-Index

Benet RM, Morejón GA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 180-188
PDF size: 380.79 Kb.


Key words:

scientific and technical publications, impact factor, periodicals as topic, citation databases.

ABSTRACT

Background: the assessment of journals is undoubtedly a continuous process that is determined by the quality of scientific papers and authors’ recognition of the most cited scientific journals.
Objective: to describe the ranking of Cuban medical journals according to the h5-index.
Methods: a bibliometric study of all scientific journals related to Cuban medical sciences included in the Virtual Health Library was conducted. The h5-index and the h5-median obtained through Google Scholar Metrics were used to calculate the ranking.
Results: eighty two point seven percent of Cuban medical journals have an h5-index registered in Google Scholar Metrics. Seventy two percent are indexed in SciELO Cuba. The average h5-index for Cuban medical journals is 6.88 and the h-median is 6.00. For those indexed in SciELO Cuba, the h5-index is 7.60. The h5-index of journals published by ECIMED is 8.69; showing significant differences in relation to other publishers in the country. Among the top 20 Cuban medical journals according to the Google Scholar H5-index, only seven are not edited by ECIMED.
Conclusions: the assessment of national journals using the h5-index is vital, even considering its weaknesses, since most of these journals are not included in databases such as Scopus and WOS.


REFERENCES

  1. Bence V, Oppenheim Ch. The role of academic journal publications in the UK Research Assessment Exercise. Learned Publishing. 2004 ; 17 (1): 53-68.

  2. Borrego A, Urbano C. La evaluación de revistas científicas en Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades. Inf Clt Soc. 2006 ; 14: 11-27.

  3. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual´s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2005 ; 102 (46): 16569-72.

  4. Google Scholar Metrics [Internet]. California: Googleplex; 2012. [ cited 12 Oct 2015 ] Available from: http://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_ venues&hl=en&vq=es.

  5. Túñez-López M. El índice H de la investigación en Comunicación en España, Portugal y Latinoamérica: Web of Knowledge (WoK), Scopus y Google Scholar Metrics. Comunication and Society [revista en Internet]. 2013 [ cited 23 Dic 2015 ] ; 26 (4): [aprox. 23p]. Available from: http://www.unav.es/fcom/communication-society/ es/resumen.php?art_id=469.

  6. Garfield E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science. 1972 ; 178 (4060): 4719.

  7. Silva Ayçaguer LC. El índice-H y Google Académico: una simbiosis cienciométrica inclusiva. ACIMED [revista en Internet]. 2012 [ cited 24 Ene 2016 ] ; 23 (3): [aprox. 17p]. Available from: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?pid=S1024-943520 12000300009&script=sci_arttext.

  8. Testa J. Playing the system puts self-citation´s impact under review. Nature. 2008 ; 455: 729.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Medisur. 2016;14