2015, Number 2
<< Back Next >>
Cir Plast 2015; 25 (2)
Notes on the paper: Cleft palate repair in two stages. Growth evaluation
Dávila DR
Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 88-99
PDF size: 147.69 Kb.
Text Extraction
No abstract.
REFERENCES
Gillies HD, Fry WK. A new principle in the surgical treatment to “congenital cleft palate”, and its mechanical counterpart. Br Med J 1921; 1: 335-338.
Blocksma R, Leuz CA, Mellerstig KE. A conservative program for managing cleft palates without the use of mucoperiosteal flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1975; 55: 160-169.
Dingman RO, Argenta LC. The correction of cleft palate with primary veloplasty and delayed repair of the palate. Clin Plast Surg 1985; 12: 677-684.
Cosman B, Falk AS. Delayed hard palate repair and speech deficiencies: a cautionary report. Cleft palate J 1980; 17: 27-33.
Witzel MA, Salyer KE, Ross RB. Delayed hard palate closure: the philosophy revised. Cleft Palate J 1984; 21: 263-269.
Shaw B, Semb G, Nelson P, Brattström V, Mölsted K, Prahl-Andersen B. The Eurocleft project 1996-2000. Standards of care for cleft lip and palate in Europe. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2000: p. 269.
Friede H. Maxillary growth controversies after two-stage palatal repair with delayed hard palate closure in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients: perspectives from literature and personal experience. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J 2007; 44: 129-136.
Slaughter WB, Pruzansky S. the rationale for velar closure as a primary procedure in the repair of cleft palate defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 1954; 13: 341-357.
Lilja J, Mars M, Elander A, Enocson L, Hagberg C, Worrell E et al. Analysis of dental arch relationships in Swedish UCLP subjects: 20 year longitudinal consecutive series treated with delayed hard palate closure. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2006; 43: 606-611.
Atack NE, Hathorn IS, Semb G et al. A new index for assessing surgical outcomes in unilateral cleft lip and palate subjects aged 5. Reproductibility and reliability. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1997; 34: 242.
Full text