medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Plástica

ISSN 2992-8559 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0625 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2016, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Cir Plast 2016; 26 (1)

Grade 1 complex incisional hernia repair with components separation and reinforcement with synthetic mesh or rectus muscle plication

Espinosa-de-los-Monteros A, Avendaño-Peza H, Gómez-Arcive Z, Arista-de la Torre L
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 6-12
PDF size: 359.76 Kb.


Key words:

Abdominal hernia, ventral hernia, complex abdominal hernia, complex abdominal defects, incisional hernia, abdominal closure techniques, reconstruction, repair.

ABSTRACT

Large and lateral incisional hernias in patients without comorbidities and without contamination at the time of repair are considered Ventral Hernia Working Group grade 1 complex hernias. The purpose of this study is to evaluate post-surgery morbidity and recurrence rates in patients with grade 1 complex hernias treated with the components separation and reinforcement technique. A total of 11 patients were treated during a period of five years, with the components separation technique. In seven patients reinforcement was performed with a synthetic mesh, while four patients underwent reinforcement with rectus muscle plication. Differences between groups were analyzed with either Fisher’s exact test or Mann-Whitney’s U depending on the type of variable studied. Postoperative morbidity was 18% and 1-year recurrence-free survival was 91%. The only patient with recurrence had a rectus muscle plication as a reinforcement method. There was a trend towards fewer postoperative complications in patients undergoing perforator-preserving components separation. We conclude that complex clean incisional hernias in patients without comorbidities tend to be less morbid if the perforator-preserving technique is used, and recurrence is lower if synthetic mesh is added to muscle closure.


REFERENCES

  1. Goodenough CJ, Ko TC, Kao LS et al. Development and validation of a risk stratification score for ventral incisional hernia after abdominal surgery: hernia expectation rates in intra-abdominal surgery (the HERNIA Project). J Am Coll Surg 2015; 220: 405-413.

  2. Slater NJ, Montgomery A, Berrevoet F et al. Criteria for definition of a complex abdominal wall hernia. Hernia 2014; 18: 7-17.

  3. Breuing K, Butler CE, Ferzoco S et al. Incisional ventral hernias: review of the literature and recommendations regarding the grading and technique of repair. Surgery 2010; 148: 544-558.

  4. Ramírez OM, Ruas E, Dellon AL. “Components separation” method for closure of abdominal-wall defects: an anatomic and clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 86: 519-526.

  5. Butler CE, Campbell KT. Minimally invasive component separation with inlay bio prosthetic mesh (MICSIB) for complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128: 698-709.

  6. Espinosa-de-los-Monteros A, Domínguez I, ZamoraValdés D, Castillo T, Fernández-Díaz OF, Luna-Torres HA. Closure of midline contaminated and recurrent incisional hernias with components separation technique reinforced with plication of the rectus muscles. Hernia 2013; 17: 75-79.

  7. Ramírez OM. Inception and evolution of the components separation technique: personal recollections. Clin Plast Surg 2006; 33: 241-246.

  8. Davison SP, Parikh PM, Jacobson JM, Iorio ML, Kalan M. A “buttressed mesh” technique for fascial closure in complex abdominal wall reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 52: 284-289.

  9. Ghazi B, Deigni O, Yezhelyev M, Losken A. Current opinion in the management of complex abdominal wall defects. Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66: 488-492.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Plast. 2016;26