medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Neurología, Neurocirugía y Psiquiatría

ISSN 0028-3851 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2011, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Neurol Neurocir Psiquiat 2011; 44 (3)

Diferentiate in the consume and requisitio in patients with hemorrhage in the brain by traumatic and atraumatic

Murillo BPR
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 11
Page: 88-93
PDF size: 91.46 Kb.


Key words:

Stroke, albumin ureic nitrogen.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Stroke is the most común disabling neurologic disease. It is the third leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer. The requisition in nutrition to the patients con haemorrhage of the brain is differente in each patology. The proteins are a very important composition of the organism adn its measurement with albúmina and ureic nitrogen help us to nourish to our patient.
Objetive. Evaluate the requisition nutriotonal in patients with traumatic brain haemorrhage and atraumatic brain haemorrhage.
Method. We quantize the nivels of albumin and ureic nitrogen in patients with traumatic brain haemorrhage and atraumatic brain haemorrhage.in the seventh day with the purpose of observing their difference.
Results. Patients with traumatic Brain Haemorrhage loose more ureic nitrogen in 24 hours urine recolectation and there isnt differences in albumin leves between both groups.
Conclusion. Mayor necesity of nutritional support and energetic requisition was confirmed in traumatic brain haemorrhage patients compared to those with not traumatic brain haemorrhage.


REFERENCES

  1. Ruíz D, Barragán. Evaluación del Estado Nutricional. Estado del Arte en Nutrición Clínica; 2007, p. 129.

  2. Hankey GJ. Isolated angeítis/angiophaty of the central nervous system. Cerebrovasc Dis 1991; 1: 2-15.

  3. Kase CS, Caplan LR. Intraerebrl Hemorrhage. Boston: Butterworth- Heinemann; 1994.

  4. The SPREAD Collaboration (Gensini GF (ed)). Italian Guidelines on Stroke. IV Ed. Milan, Italy: HyperpharGroup- CatelPublishers;2005.Availableat spread.it/Volume/chapt02/ chapt_02.htm.

  5. Cremonesi A, Setacci C, Bignamini A, Bolognese J. Carotid Artery Stenting First Consensus Document of the ICCS-SPREAD Joint Committee. Stroke 2006; 37: 2400-9.

  6. Verhoeven BAN, Moll FL, Koekkoek JAF. Statin treatment is not Associated With Consistent Alterations in Inflammatory Status of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques A Retrospective Study in 378 Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy. Stroke2006; 37: 2054-60.

  7. Crisby M, Nordin-Fredriksson G, Shah PK, Yano J, Zhu J, Nilsson J. Pravastatin treatment increases collagen content and decreases lipidcontent, inflammation, metalloproteinases, and cell death in humancarotid plaques: implications for plaque stabilization. Circulation 2001; 103: 926-33.

  8. Sacco RL, Chair FF, Adams R, Chair FV. Guidelines for Prevention of stroke in Patients with Guidelines for Prevention of Stroke in Patientes with Ischemic Stroke of Transient Ischemic Attack. A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke Co-Sponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Stroke 2006; 37: 577-617.)

  9. Albin DM, Tappenden KA. Advances in methods to evaluate gastrointestinal transport function. Curr Op Clin Nut Met Care 2001; 4(5): 351-4.

  10. Escallón J, et al. Terapia Nutricional Total. Proteínas. FELANPE Bogotá 2000, p. 43.

  11. Becker DP, Millar JD, Ward JD, et al. The outcome from severe head injuries with early diagnosis and intensive managemente. J Neurosurg 1977; 47: 491.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Neurol Neurocir Psiquiat. 2011;44