medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Educación Bioquímica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Educ Bioquimica 2017; 36 (1)

Comparación del rendimiento de aprendizaje en bioquímica de dos grupos de estudiantes de generaciones diferentes con dos tipos de bachillerato

Saldaña BY, Méndez RI, Delgadillo GHJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 12-20
PDF size: 348.52 Kb.


Key words:

Styles of teaching, learning, different high school, learning in biochemistry.

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to associate the diagnostic evaluations on Biochemistry and Molecular Biology with the final results of the course for two groups. The variables were the high school’s origin of students and the period in which this study was done. This result corresponds to 40 students per group during the periods of study 2014-2015 and 2015-2016, at the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). In the group for the period 2014-2015, the majority of students came from the College of Sciences and Humanities (CCH), UNAM and in 2015-2016 most students came from the National Preparatory School (ENP), UNAM. The results of the applied diagnostic evaluations were different between the two groups (P ‹ 0.0001) because in the 2014- 2015 period the group scores were lower. Final results of the two groups were different, the academic qualification was 5.87/10 and 7.78/10 for the period 2014-2015 and 2015-2016, respectively (P ‹ 0.0001). Whereas the diagnostic test to explore really the level of knowledge of students can be considered that the results suggest that previous knowledge was decisive for good success in learning Biochemistry and Molecular Biology.


REFERENCES

  1. Renate Marsiske. 2006. La Universidad de México: Historia y Desarrollo. Revista Historia de la Educación Latinoamericana (Rhela). 8:9-34.

  2. http://www.dgenp.unam.mx/direccgral/index. html consultada el 14 de enero de 2017

  3. http://132.248.38.20/contenido_wp/ profesores-del-sistema-incorporado/planesde- estudio-escuela-nacional-preparatoria/ Consultada el 12 de diciembre de 2016

  4. http://dgenp.unam.mx/planteles/P2/anteced. html. Consultado el 11 de enero de 2017.

  5. http//www.cch.unam.mx/programasestudio. Consultado el 4 de diciembre de 2016.

  6. rodolfopargaantropologiacchsur.blogspot. mx/2012/09/diferencia-entre-la-enp-y-el-cch. html. Consultado el 8 de enero de 2017

  7. http://www.cch.unam.mx/historia. Consultado el 4 de diciembre de 2016.

  8. Sall J, Lehman A. JMP Start Statistics. A Guide to Statistical and Data Analysis Using JMP and JMP IN Softwarte. Duxbury Press An Imprint of Wadsworth Publishing Company. 1996 by SAS Institute Inc.

  9. Triola Mario F. Estadística, Actualización Tecnológica, decimoprimera Edición, Ed. Pearson, 2013, México.

  10. Méndez Ramírez I, Namihira Guerrero D, Moreno Altamirano L. Sosa de Martínez C. (1990) El protocolo de investigación. 2da. Edición. Editorial Trillas, México.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Educ Bioquimica. 2017;36