medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Médica de Cuba

ISSN 1561-3186 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Acta Médica 2017; 18 (1)

Phaco-refractive surgery in eyes with simple microphthalmia

Pérez GD, Pérez BE, García GF, Novoa SE, de La Torre LN, Gonzáles VP
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page:
PDF size: 191.48 Kb.


Key words:

axial hypermetropia, microphthalmos, phaco-refractive surgery, phacoemulsification, predictability of intraocular lens power calculation, intraoperative floppy iris syndrome.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: the intensive technological advance of last years has brought the development of the phaco-refractive surgery, which can achieve the potential improvement from the functional and refractive point of view of the eyes with simple microphthalmos. To minimize the risks of complications and to improve the quality of the refractive results, there is necessary the adoption of measures prophylactic and taken care in the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative.
To evaluate the results of the phaco-refractive treatment in patients with simple microphthalmos.
Method: Descriptive, prospective study in 36 eyes with simple microphthalmos operated by phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implant from May 2014 to 2016. We analyzed the visual and refractive recovery, the predictability of intraocular lens calculation (between two formulas: Hoffer Q and Haigis), and the occurrence of intraoperative and postoperative complications. Follow-up was performed for 3 months.
Results: Most patients were females (78.8%), aged over 40 years (n=17.94%), and eyes with axial length less than 21 mm (35 eyes, 97%) and high hypermetropia, greater than 3 diopters 80.6%). The visual acuity without correction improved from 0.1 in the preoperative to 0.8, with 11 (35.4%) eyes that obtained maximum vision after 3 months. The obtained sphere tended to slight hypermetropia + 0.09D (DS ± 0.62). 45% (16 eyes) remained without refractive defect, 92% (33 eyes) remained with a sphere between ± 1.00D and, out of the 3 eyes (8%) that were outside the desired range, 2 were calculated by Hoffer Q. There was no case in which the sphere exceeded 2 diopters. Intraoperative floppy iris syndrome (IFIS) in 8 eyes (22%) was the most common intraoperative complication. Corneal edema and mild anterior uveitis were frequent between 24 hours and one week and all cases were given a solution.
Conclusions: Phaco-refractive surgery in microphthalmos and high axial hypermetropia is an excellent alternative for its refractive correction.


REFERENCES

  1. Avakian A. Facoemulsificação na Alta Miopia e na Alta Hipermetropia. En: Centurión V, Nicoli C, Chávez-Mondragón E. Cristalino de las Américas: La cirugía del cristalino hoy. Brasil: Editorial Jaypee- Highlights Medical Publishers; 2015. p. 757-65.

  2. Richard K, Parrish KD, Mellem Kairala MB, Simmons RJ. Nanophthalmos, Relative Anterior Microphthalmos and Axial Hyperopia. In: Steinert RF. Cataract surgery. 3th ed. Massachusets: Elsevier; 2010. p. 399-403.

  3. Medicute J, Bidaguren A, Illarramendi I. Cirugía de cristalino en ojos hipermétropes. En: Alió JL, Rodríguez JL. Buscando la excelencia en la cirugía de catarata. Barcelona: Editorial Glosa; 2007. p. 257-76.

  4. Kolega MŠ, Kovačević S, Čanović S, Pavičić AD, Bašić JK. Comparison of IOL-master and ultrasound biometry in preoperative intra ocular lens (IOL) power calculation. Coll Antropol. 2015;39:233-5.

  5. Gogate P, Ambardekar P, Kulkarni S, Deshpande R, Joshi S, Deshpande M. Comparison of endothelial cell loss after cataract surgery: phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery: six-week results of a randomized control trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:247-53.

  6. Nickisch ASW, Lambert Leal A. Perfil epidemiológico de pacientes intervenidos quirúrgicamente de cataratas. Rev Postgr Med. 2005 [citado 6 Nov 2015];148:5-8. Disponible en: http://med.unne.edu.ar/revista/revista148/2_148.htm

  7. Pérez Gómez D, García González F, Zometa Estrada CF, Novoa Sánchez E, Tamargo Barbeito TO. Frecuencia y factores pronósticos del síndrome de iris laxo intraoperatorio. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2016 [citado 6 Nov 2015];29:1. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762016000100006

  8. Zacharías W. Ecobiometría y cálculo de la lente intraocular para cirugía de catarata. En: Centurión V, Nicoli C, Chávez-Mondragón E. Cristalino de las Américas: La cirugía del cristalino hoy. Brasil: Editorial Jaypee- Highlights Medical Publishers; 2015: Sec. XI, p. 79-93.

  9. Sánches Caballero JC. Cálculo de LIO. Noticiero Alaccsa-R de julio-agosto. 2015.

  10. Moschos MM, Chatziralli IP, Koutsandrea C. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with short axial length. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2014;62:692-4.

  11. Andújar Coba P, Lantigua Maldonado IC, Hormigó Puertas IF, Fernández García K. Monovisión con lente intraocular monofocal en pacientes présbitas. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2010 [citado 6 Nov 2015];23:[aprox. 6 p.]. Disponible en:http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762010000400011

  12. Rojas Álvarez E, Miranda Hernández I, Ruiz Rodríguez Y, González Sotero Y. Extracción de cristalino transparente en pacientes hipermétropes. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2011 [citado 6 Nov 2015];24(1):[aprox. 1 p.]. Disponible en:http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762011000100004

  13. Hernández Silva JR, Pérez Llanes A, Galá Herrera LE, Ramos López M, Veitía Rovirosa Z, Padilla González C. Resultados del cálculo del poder del lente intraocular mediante la fórmula de Haigis. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2010 [citado 6 Nov 2015];23(Suppl 1):[aprox. 8 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762010000300008

  14. Carifi G, Aiello F, Zygoura V, Kopsachilis N, Maurino V. Accuracy of the refractive prediction determined by multiple currently available intraocular lens power calculation formulas in small eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:577-83.

  15. Hernández Silva JR, Ramos López M, Curbelo Cunill L, Fernández Vásquez G, Rio Torres M, Ruiz Rodríguez Y. Astigmatismo posquirúrgico en la facoemulsificación según el lugar de la incisión. Rev Cubana Oftalmol. 2012 [citado 6 Nov 2015];25(1):[aprox. 7 p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864- 21762012000100002

  16. Shammas HJ, Shammas MC. Improving the preoperative prediction of the anterior pseudophakic distance for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2379-86.

  17. Olsen T, Hoffmann P. C constant: new concept for ray tracing-assisted intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:764-73.

  18. Fernández Soler FL. Cálculo de la lente intraocular: ¿Qué fórmula usar y por qué? Fuentes de error en queratometría y biometría. En: Alió JL, Rodríguez JL. Buscando la excelencia en la cirugía de catarata. Barcelona: Editorial Glosa; 2007. p. 66-91.

  19. Day AC, Foster PJ, Stevens JD. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations in eyes with axial length <22.00 mm. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2012;40(9):855-62.

  20. Roh YR, Lee SM, Han YK, Kim MK, Wee WR, Lee JH. Intraocular lens power calculation using IOLMaster and various formulas in short eyes. Korean J Ophthalmol. 2011;25:151-5




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Acta Médica. 2017;18