medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Pediatría

ISSN 0035-0052 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Pediatr 2017; 84 (5)

Neonatal complications associated to assisted reproductive techniques at the Hospital Español of Mexico

Moguel-Hernández A, Tietzsch-Escalante P, Iglesias-Leboreiro J, Bernárdez-Zapata I, Ramírez-Haua JL, Braverman-Bronstein A
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 182-188
PDF size: 236.82 Kb.


Key words:

Cohort, newborn, neonatal complications, assisted reproductive techniques.

ABSTRACT

Background: Infertility affects 2 to 25% of the reproductive age population. Objective: To describe fetal complications associated with assisted reproduction techniques (ART) and determine their differences between spontaneous pregnancies and ART at the Hospital Español de México. Material and methods: Prospective cohort study, we included all singleton newborns in a period of one year. Frequencies and percentages were calculated; mean and standard deviation for continuous variables Chi square, Student’s t-test and multivariate Poisson models were used for the inferential analysis. Results: We included 1,584 newborns, from which 1,365 (86.2%) where conceived spontaneously and 219 (13.8%) with ART. We found that there was an increased risk of neonatal complications such as prematurity (18.9%), neonatal jaundice (10.7%) and admisions to a neonatal intensive care unit (14.3%), as well as higher incidence of complications associated to pregnancy such as gestational hypertension (12.9%) and gestational diabetes (6.9%) among ART. Conclusions: Newborns from ART are at higher risk of complications than spontaneous pregnancies.


REFERENCES

  1. Brugo-Olmedo S, Chillik C, Kopelman S. Definición y causas de la infertilidad. Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol. 2003; 54(4): 227-247.

  2. Rinesi L, Leiva T, Sdrigoti A, Rodriguez M, Serpa I, Miechi H, y cols. Trabajo libre. Resultados perinatales de embarazos simples mediante ICSI y embarazos espontáneos. 2014; 29: 54-59.

  3. Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a metaanalysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103(3): 551-563.

  4. Sanchis CA, Marcos PB, Juan GL, Morales SV, Abeledo GA, Balanzá MR y cols. Características de los recién nacidos tras fecundación in vitro. An Pediatr (Barc). 2009; 70(4): 333-339.

  5. Delgado-Becerra A, Morales-Barquet DA. Epidemiología del embarazo gemelar doble en el Instituto Nacional de Perinatología “Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes”. Perinatol Reprod Hum. 2013; 27(3): 153-160.

  6. Lubchenco LO, Hansman C, Dressler M, Boyd E. Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth-weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation. Pediatrics. 1963; 32(5): 793-800.

  7. Delgadillo JC, Méndez LM, Chávez VG, Acosta SV, Solís VS, Gaviño FG. Resultados perinatales de embarazos por fertilización in vitro con transferencia de embriones (FIVTE): Un estudio de casos y controles. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 2006; 74(12): 626-639.

  8. Guevara JA. Complicaciones materno-perinatales de embarazos triples en el Hospital Nacional “Edgardo Rebagliati Martins”, de enero 1999 a diciembre 2010. Horiz Méd. 2012; 12(1): 19-24.

  9. Álvarez DA, Corzo TG, Álvarez TR. Morbilidad y mortalidad del recién nacido concebido por fertilización in vitro. Rev Cuba Obstet y Ginecol. 2010; 36(2): 51-61.

  10. McElrath TF, Wise PH. Fertility therapy and the risk of very low birth weight. Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 90(4 Pt 1): 600-605.

  11. Draper ES, Kurinczuk JJ, Abrams KR, Clarke M. Assessment of separate contributions to perinatal mortality of infertility history and treatment: a case-control analysis. Lancet. 1999; 353: 1746- 1749.

  12. Wisborg K, Ingerslev HJ, Henriksen TB. In vitro fertilization and preterm delivery, low birth weight, and admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: a prospective follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 2010; 94(6): 2102-2106.

  13. Kondapalli LA, Perales-Puchalt A. Low birth weight: Is it related to assissted reproductive technology or underlying infertility? Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(2): 303-310.

  14. Congenital anomalies. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/ fs370/en/.

  15. Vasario E, Borgarello V, Bossotti C, Libanori E, Biolcati M, Arduino S et al. IVF twins have similar obstetric and neonatal outcome as spontaneously conceived twins: A prospective follow-up study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010; 21(3): 422-428.

  16. Noriega-Álvarez R, Iglesias-Leboreiro J, Bernardez-Zapata I. Comparación clínica de reproducción asistida y concepción espontánea en gemelos prematuros. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2014; 52(5): 544-549.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Pediatr. 2017;84