medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Pediatría

ISSN 0035-0052 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Pediatr 2017; 84 (5)

Sensitivity and specificity of murmur and cyanosis for the detection of congenital heart disease in the neonatal period

Gálvez-Cancino F
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 189-195
PDF size: 279.41 Kb.


Key words:

Murmur, cyanosis, congenital heart disease, detection, neonate.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Congenital heart disease is the most common major malformation; its incidence is close to 1%. Cardiac auscultation may be limited in the neonate and oxygen saturation helps detect complex congenital heart disease. Objective: To determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of murmur and cyanosis for the detection of neonatal congenital heart disease. Material and methods: In a maternalinfant hospital, we studied patients who had persistent low saturations or murmurs within the first 30 days of life; a control group was also included. Transthoracic echocardiography was performed in both groups. Those neonates with patent foramen ovale as the only finding and those with a physiological ductus arteriosus were excluded. Results: We evaluated 92 patients with cyanosis and/or murmur, and 126 controls, detecting 56 with a cardiac defect. Murmur for noncomplex heart disease detection: sensitivity 88%, specificity 91%, PPV 72%, NPV 97%. Cyanosis for detection of complex congenital heart diseases: Sensitivity 95%, specificity 72%, PPV 45%, NPV 99.2%. Cyanosis with murmur: sensitivity 63%, specificity 95%, PPV 92%, NPV 75%. Conclusions: Murmur is the cardinal sign for detection of non-critical heart disease. Cyanosis was the most important sign for detection of complex congenital heart disease, increasing its PPV from 45 to 92% when associated with murmur.


REFERENCES

  1. Perich-Durán R. Cardiopatías congénitas más frecuentes. Pediatr Integral. 2008; 12(8): 807-818.

  2. Bernier PL, Stefanescu A, Samoukovic G, Tchervenkov CI. The challenge of congenital heart disease world wide: epidemiologic and demographic facts. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Ann. 2010; 13(1): 26-34.

  3. Mendieta-Alcántara GG, Santiago-Alcántara E, Mendieta-Zerón H, Dorantes-Piña R, Zárate-Alarcón G, Otero-Ojeda G. Incidencia de las cardiopatías congénitas y los factores asociados a la letalidad en niños nacidos en dos hospitales del Estado de México. Gaceta Médica de México. 2013; 149: 617-623.

  4. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Mujeres y Hombres en México 2015. [Internet] [Consultado el 1 de diciembre del 2016]. Disponible en: http://cedoc.inmujeres.gob.mx/documentos_ download/101256.pdf

  5. Oster M, Lee K, Honein M, Colarusso T, Shin M, Correa A. Temporal trends in survival among infants with critical congenital heart defects. Pediatrics. 2013; 131(5): e1502-e1508.

  6. Massin MM, Astadicko I, Dessy H. Noncardiac comorbidities of congenital heart disease in children. Acta Paediatr. 2007; 96(5): 753-755.

  7. Del-Valle A, Sajmoló-Pablo M. Anormalidades cromosómicas asociadas a cardiopatías congénitas en pacientes pediátricos. Revista Guatemalteca de Cardiología. 2013; 23(1): 10-14.

  8. Gowda S, Gawde H, Hyderi A, Savitha M, Krishnamurthy B, Karat S et al. Chromosomal anomalies and congenital heart disease in Mysore, South India. Int J Hum Genet. 2010; 10(1- 3): 131-139.

  9. Romera G, Zunzunegui JL. Recién nacido con sospecha de cardiopatía congénita. España [Internet] [Consultado el 23 de febrero del 2014]. Disponible en: https://www.aeped.es/sites/ default/files/documentos/35.pdf

  10. Fernández L, López M. Exploración cardiológica, actualización en pediatría 2005. España [Internet] [Consultado el 23 de febrero del 2014]. Disponible en: https://www.aepap.org/sites/default/files/ exploracion_cardiologica.pdf

  11. Oliver-Ruíz JM, González-García AE. Síndrome hipoxémico crónico. Cardiopatías congénitas del adulto. Rev Esp Cardiol Supl. 2009; 9: 13-22.

  12. Carvajal C. Cardiopatía congénita cianótica y anestesia. Rev Chil Anest. 2013; 42: 97-112.

  13. Monroy-Muñoz IE, Pérez-Hernández N, Vargas-Alarcón G, Ortiz- San Juan N, Buendía-Hernández A, Calderón-Colmenero J et al. Cambiando el paradigma en las cardiopatías congénitas: de la anatomía a la etiología molecular. Gaceta Médica de México. 2013; 149: 212-219.

  14. Thangaratinam S, Brown K, Zamora J, Khan KS, Ewer AK. Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects in asymptomatic newborn babies: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Lancet. 2012; 379(9835): 2459-2464.

  15. Medrano-Medrano C, Guía-Torrentb JM, Rueda-Núñez F, Moruno-Tirado A. Actualización en cardiología pediátrica y cardiopatías congénitas. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2009; 62(Supl 1): 39-52.

  16. Maroto-Monedero C, Camino-López M, Girona-Comas JM. Malo- Concepción P. Guías de práctica clínica de la Sociedad Española de Cardiología en las cardiopatías congénitas del recién nacido. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2001; 54: 49-66.

  17. Calderón-Colmenero J. Métodos diagnósticos en las cardiopatías congénitas. Arch Cardiol Mex. 2006; S2: 152-156.

  18. Benson LW, Freedom RAM. The transitional circulation. En: Fredom RM, Benson LN, Smallhorn JF, editores. Neonatal heart disease. Londres: Springer-Verlag, 1992; pp. 149-164.

  19. Steinhorn RH. Evaluation and management of the cyanotic neonate. Clin Pediatr Emerg Med. 2008; (3): 169-175.

  20. Golombek SG, Sola A, Baquero H, Borbonet D, Cabañasa F, Fajardo CG et al. Primer consenso clínico de SIBEN: enfoque diagnóstico y terapéutico del ductus arterioso permeable en recién nacidos pretérmino. An Pediatr (Barc). 2008; 69(5): 454-481.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Pediatr. 2017;84