Sosa-Durán EE

Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page: 188
PDF size: 70.34 Kb.

Text Extraction

No abstract.

REFERENCES

1. Manchikanti L, Kaye AD, Boswell MV, Hirsch JA. Medical Journal peer review: process and bias. Pain Physician 2015; 18(1): E1-14.

2. Spier R. The history of peer-review process. Trends Biotechnol 2002; 20(8): 357-8.

3. Gandhi M, Louis FS, Wilson SH, Clark SL. Clinical perspective: creating an effective practice peer review process-a primer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 216(3): 244-9.

4. Thomas SP. Conceptual debates and empirical evidence about the peer review process for scholarly journals. J Prof Nurs. 2011; 27(3): 168-73.

5. Manual de clasificación de las revistas mexicanas de ciencia y tecnología. CRMCYT 2017 p. 9 Consultado en: http://www.revistascytconacyt.mx/manual-sistema-crmcyt.pdf

6. Napolitani F, Petrini C, Garattini S. Ethics of reviewing scientific publications. Eur J Intern Med. 2017; 40: 22-5.