medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Orthotips AMOT

ISSN 2007-8560 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión Científica de la Federación Mexicana de Colegios de Ortopedia y Traumatología, A.C. (FEMECOT)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Ortho-tips 2017; 13 (2)

Fracture dislocation of the subaxial cervical spine. What approach do you use?

Ortiz SR
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 73-81
PDF size: 140.68 Kb.


Key words:

Fractures, luxation, cervical spine, quadriplegic, surgery.

ABSTRACT

The basis for the treatment of the spine fractures is surgical intervention, stabilization, atraumatic management and, early mobilization. These concepts were first described in 1970 and there have been a few changes since then. There is no current international consensus for the management in patients with Neurological deficit, and we must consider different clinical findings to choose the best choice of treatment. The correct management for the quadriplegic patient is not clear, although most surgeons recommend surgical intervention as soon as possible to avoid respiratory complications and reduce the hospitalization time. Most studies have shown a higher mortality in patients with surgical intervention before the first 48 hours after the spinal injury due to pulmonary and hemodynamic complications. The best choice of treatment for the patient with cervical spine injury must consider the following clinical features: Mechanism of injury, trauma kinetics, quality of radiographic images, most compromised tissue, classification of the lesions using the Frankel or ASIA scales, evaluate the severity of the injury using the SLIC scale. In summary, there is no consensus for the management of these patients, and we must choose the best option by considering these clinical features.


REFERENCES

  1. Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Schneider R, Willenegger H. Manual of internal fixation. 3rd. ed. 1977, pp. 627-629.

  2. Dvorak MF, Fisher CG, Fehlings MG, Rampersaud YR, Oner FC, Aarabi B, et al. The surgical approach to subaxial cervical spine injuries: an evidence-based algorithm based on the SLIC classification system. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32 (23): 2620-2629.

  3. Vaccaro AR, Hulbert RJ, Patel AA, Fisher C, Dvorak M, Lehman RA Jr., et al. The subaxial cervical spine injury classification system: a novel approach to recognize the importance of morphology, neurology, and integrity of the disco- ligamentous complex. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32 (21): 2365-2374.

  4. Patel AA, Hurlber RJ, Bono CM, Bessey J, Yang N, Vaccaro A. Classification and surgical decision making in acute subaxial cervical spine trauma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35 (21): S228-234.

  5. Campbell MJ, Carreon LY, Traynelis V, Anderons PA. Use of cervical collar after single-level anterior cervical fusión with plate. It is necessary? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34 (1): 43-48.

  6. Brandestein D, Molinari RW, Rubery PT, Rechtine GR. Unstable subaxial cervical spine injury with normal computed tomography and magnetic resonance. Initial imaging studies. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34 (20): E743-750.

  7. Mallham GM, Ackland HM, Varma DK. Traumatic cervical discoligamentous injuries: correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and operative findings. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34 (25): 2754-2759.

  8. Van Middendorp JJ, Goss B, Urquhart S, Atresh S, Williams RP, Schuetz M. Diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic spinal cord injury. Global Spine J. 2011; 1 (1): 1-8.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ortho-tips. 2017;13