medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales de Radiología, México

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Anales de Radiología México 2017; 16 (4)

Tomographic findings in acute post-operative mediastinitis

Herrera-Jurado EF, Gómez-Camargo C, Criales-Vera SA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 268-275
PDF size: 734.67 Kb.


Key words:

acute post-operative mediastinitis, sternal wound dehiscence, computerized tomography.

ABSTRACT

Objetive: describe the most common findings obtained by computerized tomography in patients with diagnosis of acute post-operative mediastinitis.
Material and Methods: a descriptive, observational, retrospective study of 94 patients who underwent heart surgery at Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Dr. Ignacio Chávez in Mexico City and had clinical suspicion of acute post-operative mediastinitis, all in the period between January 2012 and December 2014. The selection of cases was made based on the referral diagnosis reporting clinical suspicion of post-operative mediastinitis and records kept by the institute’s committee on hospital infections with bacteriological diagnosis of mediastinitis. Cross referencing was applied with demographic variables, tomography findings, and reports of causal microbial agents. Statistical analysis was conducted with SPSS v.24 statistical software for distribution of frequencies and percentage distribution.
Results: 68 patients with clinical suspicion of mediastinitis underwent tomographies, 30 of them were reported as probable mediastinitis, which was confirmed by microbiological culture; 28 of the cases were not compatible with mediastinitis in the tomographies, while 4 and 6 patients were false positives and negatives, respectively. This allows us to establish that in our study tomography had 83% sensitivity and 87% specificity, 88% positive predictive value, and 82% negative predictive value. In 26 of the cases reported as mediastinitis, the committee on infections did not use tomography as a diagnostic method. Valve replacement surgery was the most frequent procedure (42.6%), followed by coronary revascularization surgery (33.8%). The most common tomography findings included; alteration in attenuation of mediastinal fat (83%), pleural effusion (80%), mediastinal collection (63.3%), pericardial effusion (53.3%), pneumomediastinum (40%), sternal wound dehiscence (33.3%), collection in presternal soft tissue (33.3%), and adenomegaly (23.3%).
Conclusions: today, acute mediastinitis is the leading complication following cardiothoracic surgery, especially valve replacement and coronary revascularization. Computerized tomography is a non-invasive method particularly useful in differentiating superficial infectious processes involving the mediastinum; however, in 26.7% of the study cases, the diagnosis was based on clinical findings and microbiological studies, with Staphylococcus epidermidis the causal agent most frequently involved in mediastinal infection, similar to results from other series. The rate of mortality remains significant in this group of patients; in our series, it was estimated at 33.8%.


REFERENCES

  1. Roth GA, Huffman MD, Moran AE y cols: Global and Regional Patterns in Cardiovascular Mortality From 1990 to 2013. Circulation 2015;132(17):1667-1678.

  2. Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO y cols: Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease, Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2014;63:57.

  3. Vahanian A, Alfieri O, Andreotti F y cols: Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease. Joint Task Force on the Management of Valvular Heart Disease of the European Society of Cardiology and the European, European Heart Journal 2012;33:2451-2496.

  4. Iung B, Vahanian A. Epidemiology of valvular heart disease in the adult. Nature Reviews Cardiology 2011;8:162-172.

  5. Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN y cols: Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368.(9540):1005-11.

  6. Kollef MH, Sharpless L, Vlasnik J y cols: The impact of nosocomial infections on patient outcome following cardiac surgery. Chest. 1997;112(3):666-675.

  7. Rebollo MH, Bernal J.M, Llorca J y cols: Nosocomial infections in patients having cardiovascular operations: A multivariate analysis of risk factors. J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg 1996;112:908-913.

  8. Blanchard A, Hurni M, Ruchat P, cols: Incidence of deep and superficial sternal infection after open heart surgery a ten years retrospective study from 1981 to 1991. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995;9:153-7.

  9. Al-Sehly AA, Robinson JL, Lee BE, cols:Pediatric poststernotomy mediastinitis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:2314-2320

  10. Fowler VG, O'Brien SM, Muhlbaier LH, cols: Clinical predictors of major infection after cardiac surgery. Circulation 2005;30(suppl):I358-I365.

  11. Abboud CS, Wey SB, Baltar VT. Risk factors for mediastinitis after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac. Surg 2004;77:676-683.

  12. Risnes I, Abdelnoor M, Almdahl SM, cols: Mediastinitis After coronary artery bypass grafting risk factors and longterm. Thorac Surg 2010;89:1502-10.

  13. Lim E, Motalleb-Zadeh R, Wallard M, cols: Pyrexia after cardiac surgery: Natural history and association with infection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;126:1013-1017.

  14. Munoz P, Menasalvas A, Bernaldo de Quiros JC, et al. Postsurgical mediastinitis: a case-control study. Clin Infect Dis 1997;25:1060-1064.

  15. Fariñas MC, Gald PF, Bernal JM, cols: Suppurative mediastinitis after open-heart surgery: a case-control study covering a seven-year period in Santander, Spain. Clin Infect Dis 1995;20:272.

  16. Hajj-Chahine J, Allain G, Tomasi J, cols: Late Postcardiotomy Sternal Dehiscence: A Simple Approach Using Stratos® System. J Card Surg 2013;28:632-634.

  17. Fernández de la Reguera G, Soto G, Nurivan M, cols: Mediastinitis posquirúrgica. Arch Cardiol Mex 2011;81(Supl 2):64- 72.

  18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Healthcare Safety Network. CDC/NHSN surveillance definitions for specific types of infections. 2016. Available from:http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/ pscManual/17pscNosInfDef -current.pdf. Accessed April 24 2016.

  19. Jolles H, Henry DA, Roberson JP, cols: Mediastinitis following median sternotomy: CT findings. Radiology 1996;201:463

  20. Exarhos D.N., Malagari, K., Tsatalou, E.G, cols. Acute mediastinitis: spectrum of computed tomography findings. Eur Radiol 2005;15:1569.

  21. Bitkover CY, Cederlund K, Aberg B, cols. Computed tomography of the sternum and mediastinum after median sternotomy. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:858-63.

  22. Yamashiro T, Kamiya H, Murayama S., cols. Infectious mediastinitis after cardiovascular surgery: role of computed tomography. Radiation Medicine 2008;26:343-347.

  23. Macedo CA, Da Silva ME, Kato U., cols. Acute mediastinitis: multidetector computed tomography findings following cardiac surgery. Radiol Bras 2008;41(4):269-273.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Anales de Radiología México. 2017;16