medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Anales Médicos de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC

ISSN 0185-3252 (Print)
Revista de la Asociación Médica del Centro Médico ABC
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC 2017; 62 (4)

Comparison between mechanical ventilation with and without positive end-expiratory pressure and the gradient of carbon dioxide in laparoscopy

Chávez VJV, Juárez PJS, Licona OS
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 14
Page: 251-255
PDF size: 221.52 Kb.


Key words:

End-tidal carbon dioxide, arterial blood pressure of carbon dioxide, mechanical ventilation, positive end-expiratory pressure, laparoscopic surgery.

ABSTRACT

Background: The use of positive end-expiratory pressure during mechanical ventilation in laparoscopic surgery contributes to the decrease of the gradient end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2 )-arterial blood pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2 ). Objective: We compared the values of the difference between EtCO2 and PaCO2 using mechanical ventilation with and without positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic surgery. Material and methods: A comparative, longitudinal study was conducted, which included a total of 22 patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, who were divided randomly into two groups: 1, mechanical ventilation with volume control 6.6 mL/kg, with 8 cmH2 O of PEEP; 2, mechanical ventilation with volume control 6.6 mL/kg. The tidal volume delivered, average breathing rate, PaCO2 , EtCO2 , and pneumoperitoneum pressure were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed with the Mann-Whitney U test through the SPSS program version 22. Results: No statistically significant difference was found in the EtCO2 and PaCO2 gradient in the groups that used PEEP against those who did not use it. Conclusions: There are likely no significant differences in the gap between EtCO2 and PaCO2 when using mechanical ventilation by volume control with or without PEEP. The value of PaCO2 may be lower than that of EtCO2 .


REFERENCES

  1. . Cheng Y, Lu J, Xiong X, Wu S, Lin Y, Wu T et al. Gases for establishing pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. [Consultado el 04 de mayo de 2017] [Edición en línea]. 2013; 31(1): [53 páginas]. Disponible en: http://www.cochrane.org/CD009569/COLOCA_different-gases-for-insufflation-into-the-abdominal-cavity-during-laparoscopic-abdominal-surgery

  2. Geng G, Hu J, Huan S. Effects of different inhaled oxygen concentration and end-expiratory positive pressure on Pa-etCO2 in patients undergoing gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013; 6 (10): 956-959.

  3. Hayden P, Cowman S. Anaesthesia for laparoscopic surgery, continuing education in anaesthesia. BJA Education. 2011; 11 (5): 177-180.

  4. Walsh BK, Crotwell DN, Restrepo RD. Capnography/capnometry during mechanical ventilation: 2011. Respir Care. 2011; 56 (4): 503-509.

  5. Satoh K, Ohashi A, Kumagai M, Sato M, Kuji A. Joh S. Evaluations of differences between PaCO2 and ETCO2 by age as measured during general anesthesia with patients in a supine position. Journal of Anesthesiology. [Consultado el 26 de febrero de 2017]. [Edición en línea]. 2015. [5 páginas] Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/710537

  6. Razi E, Moosavi G, Omidi K, Saebi A, Razi A. Correlation of end-tidal carbon dioxide with arterial carbon dioxide in mechanically ventilated patients. Arch Trauma Res. 2012; 1 (2): 58-62.

  7. Solano M, Castillo I, Nińo de Mejía M. Hypocapnia in neuroanesthesia: Current situation. Rev Colomb Anestesiol. 2012; 40 (2): 137-144.

  8. Grüne F, Kazmaier S, Sonntag H, Stolker RJ, Weyland A. Moderate hyperventilation during intravenous anesthesia increases net cerebral lactate efflux. Anesthesiology. 2014; 120 (2): 335-342.

  9. Aristizábal R, Calvo L, Valencia L, Montoya M, Barbosa O, Hincapié BV. Acid-base equilibrium: The best clinical approach. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2015; 43 (3): 219-224.

  10. Way M, Hill G. Intraoperative end-tidal carbon dioxide concentrations: what is the target? Anesthesiol Research and Practice. [Consultado el 03 de marzo de 2016]. [Edición en línea]. 2011. [3 páginas]. Disponible en: URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/271539

  11. Tao T, Bo L, Chen F, Xie Q, Zou Y, Hu B et al. Effect of protective ventilation on posoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing general anaesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2014; 4 (6): e005208.

  12. Norma Oficial Mexicana 006-SSA3-201 para la práctica de la anestesiología. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Consultada el 04/05/17. [Edición en línea]. 2012. [12 páginas]. Disponible en: http://www.dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5240668&fecha=23/03/2012

  13. López G, Zavalza JF, Paipilla O, Lee S. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy accomplished in ambulatory unit surgery. Cirujano General. 2011; 33 (2): 104-110.

  14. Vázquez JC, Pérez R. Estimated values for blood gas main towns and sites more altitude in Mexico. Rev Inst Nal Resp Mex. 2000; 13 (1): 6-13.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

An Med Asoc Med Hosp ABC. 2017;62