medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2018; 78 (2)

Bladder perforations detected during transurethral resection of the bladder

Collura-Merlier S, Arzate-Soriano RE, Ochoa-López JM, Gómez-Alvarado MO, Chamlati-Cuello JM, Castillejos-Molina RA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 18
Page: 112-118
PDF size: 326.34 Kb.


Key words:

Non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma, Bladder cancer, Transurethral resection, Bladder perforation, Recurrence.

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To determine the incidence of bladder perforation detected during transurethral resection of the bladder due to urothelial cancer and its association with risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention to reduce complications that modify patient outcome, increasing the risk for recurrence, progression, and metastasis.
Material and Method: A retrospective and prospective study was conducted on patients that underwent transurethral resection of the bladder due to non-muscle-invasive urothelial cancer at the Urology Service of the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, within the time frame of 1987 to February 2017. Cases of bladder perforation detected during the procedure were described, and the demographic and clinical variables were evaluated.
Results: Of the 556 patients that underwent transurethral resection of the bladder, 7 had detected bladder perforation: 4 were cases of extraperitoneal perforation and 3 were intraperitoneal. One patient with extraperitoneal perforation presented with extravesical recurrence that was treated conservatively.
Conclusions: The incidence of bladder perforations found in our study was low. It was associated with age, tumor grade, and number of resected tumors, but not with BMI. Unlike descriptions in the literature, extravesical recurrence was not associated with intraperitoneal perforation. The urologist should be aware of the complications of the procedure and treat them opportunely.


REFERENCES

  1. Ploeg M, Aben KK, Kiemeney LA. The present and future burden of urinary bladder cancer in the world. World J Urol 2009;27:289-293.

  2. Ghali F, Moses RA, Raffin E, et al. What factors are associated with unplanned return following transurethral resection of bladder tumor? An analysis of large single institutions experience. Scandinavian J Urol 2016;50(5):370-373.

  3. Cusano A, Murphy G, Haddock P, et al. Tumor seeding as a result of intraperitoneal perforation during transurethral resection of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. BMJ Case Rep 2014:1-3.

  4. Skolarikos A, Chrisofos M, Ferakis N et al. Does the management of bladder perforation during transurethral resection of superficial bladder tumors predispose to extravesical tumor recurrence? J Urol 2005;173:1908-1911.

  5. Herkommer K, Hofer C, Gschwend J, et al. Gender and body mass index as risk factors for bladder perforation during primary transurethral resection of bladder tumors. J Urol 2012;187:1566-1570.

  6. Golan S, Baniel J, Lask D, et al. Transurethral resection of bladder tumour complicated by perforation requiring open surgical repair – clinical characteristics and oncological outcomes. B J Urol Int 2010;107:1065-1068.

  7. Kim JH and Yang WJ. Delayed spontaneous perforation of urinary bladder with intraperitoneal seeding following radical transurethral resection of invasive urothelial cancer: case report. BMC Research Notes 2014;7(167):1-3.

  8. Collado A. Chechile GE, Salvador J, et al. Early complications of endoscopic treatment of superficial bladder tumors. J Urol 2000:164:1529-1532.

  9. De Nuzio C, Franco G, Cindolo L, et al. Transuretral resection of the bladder (TURB): Analysis of complications using a modified Clavien system in an Italian real life cohort. EJSO 2014;40:90-95.

  10. Nieder AM, Meinbach DS, Kim SS. Transurethral bladder tumor resection: intraoperative and postoperative complications in a residency setting. J Urol 2005;174:2307-2309.

  11. Dick A, Barnes R, Hadley H, et al. Complications of transurethral resections of bladder tumors: prevention, recognition and treatment. J Urol 1980;124:810.

  12. Balbay MD, Cimentepe E, Ünsal A, et al. The actual incidence of bladder perforation following transurethral bladder surgery. J Urol 2005;174:2260-2263.

  13. Manikandan R, Lynch N and Grills R. Percutaneous peritoneal drainage for intraperitoneal bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumors. J Endourol 2003;17(10):945-947.

  14. Mydlo JH, Weinstein R, Shah S, et al. Long-term consequences from bladder perforation and/or violation in the presence of transitional cell carcinoma: results of a small series and a review of the literature. J Urol 1999;161:1128-1132.

  15. Boreham P. The surgical spread of cancer in urology. Br J Urol 1956;28:163-75.

  16. El Hayek OR, Coelho RF, Dall ́oglio MF, Murta CB, et al. Evaluation of the incidence of bladder perforation after transurethral bladder tumor resection in residency setting. J Endourology 2009;23:1183-1186.

  17. Pladzyk K, Jureczko L and Lazowski T. Over 500 obturator nerve blocks in the lithotomy position during transurethral resection bladder tumor. J Urol 2012;65(2):67-70.

  18. Jo YY, Choi E, Kil HK. Comparison of the success rate of inguinal approach with classical pubic approach for obturator nerve block in patients undergoing TURB. J Anesthesiol 2011;61(2):143-147.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2018;78