medigraphic.com
Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud de la Universidad de Guadalajara y del OPD Hospitales Civiles de Guadalajara

2005, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Inv Salud 2005; 7 (1)

Workplace mobbing in university employed

Acosta FM, Pando MM, Aranda BC, Aldrete RMG

Language: Spanish
References: 23
Page: 16-23
PDF size: 336.46 Kb.


ABSTRACT

This research paper offers the outcomes about the mobbing prevalence in a group of administrative and service workers, as well as to identify the more recurrent behaviors and mobbing situations. The type of study was the not experimental, with a transverse and correlational design. The mobbing prevalence was 10.3 percent for both groups. The prevalence registered in the administrative workers was 6.86 percent, while in the service workers was of 3.44 percent. The more frequent mobbing behaviors corresponded to restricting communication. While the more used strategies were: To criticize his/her work, the partners hindering his/her expression, to ignore his/her presence, to calumniate him/her and their murmuring to their backs, and to exaggerate their errors.


REFERENCES

  1. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work Bullying at work, Facts 23 Bilbao, 2002.

  2. Leymann H. “The Definition of Mobbing at Workplaces” The Mobbing Encyclopaedia http://www.leymann.se/English/frame.html/12100e

  3. Leymann H, Tallgren U. Undersokningav frekven-sen vuxenmobbing inom SSAB (Investigation into the frequency of adult mobbing in SSAB a Swedish steel company using LIPT questionnarie) Arbete, miinniska, miljo 1, lla-115. 1989.

  4. Zapf D, Knorz C, Kulla M. “On the relationship between mobbing factors, and job content, the social work environment and health outcomes”, European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 1996;5:215-37.

  5. Zapf D. “Organisational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work”. International Journal of Manpower, 1999;20(1/2).

  6. Einarsen S. “The nature and causes of bullying at work”, International Journal of Manpower, 1999;20(1 y 2).

  7. Dejours C. Travail: usure mentale. Paris: Bayard Éditions. 1993.

  8. Dejours C. Souffrance en France: la banalisation de l’injustice sociale. Paris: Senil. 1998.

  9. Hirigoyen MF. El acoso moral en el trabajo: Distinguir lo verdadero de lo falso. España, Paidós. 2001.

  10. Piñuel I. “Mobbing” Cómo sobrevivir al acoso psicológico en el trabajo. Santander: Sal Térrea. 2001.

  11. Piñuel I. “La violencia psicológica en el trabajo” Informe CISNEROS II sobre “Violencia en el entorno laboral” Resultados preliminares del barómetro CISNEROS II. España. 2002.

  12. González JL, Rodríguez M. “Cuestionario de estrategias de acoso psicológico: El LIPT-60”. Psiquiatría.com, 2003;7(5).

  13. Quine L. Workplace Bullying in NHS Community Trust: Staff Questionnaire Survey. British Medical Journal, 1999;318:229.

  14. Paoli P, Merllié D. 3eme Enquête européenne sur les conditions de travail Fondation européenne pour l’amélioration des conditions de vie et de travail. Dublín. 2000, p.42.

  15. The Workplace Bullying & Trauma Institute U.S. Hostile Workplace Survey 2000 Michigan: 2000 pág 1. (traducción de Acosta M).

  16. Soares A. Quand le travail devient indécent: le harcèlement psychologique au travail. Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal: Janvier 2002, pág. 11 (traducción de Acosta M).

  17. Di Martino Workplace violence in the health sector – country case studies Brazil, Bulgaria, Lebanon, Portugal, South Africa, Thailand, plus an additional Australian study: synthesis report. ILO/ICN/PSI Joint Programme on Workplace Violence in the Health Sector, 2002, Geneva en: Cassitto, MG., Fattorini, E., Gilioli, R. et al Raising awareness of psychological harassment at work Protecting Workers’ Health Series No 4. Italy 2002.

  18. González JL, Rodríguez M. Cuestionario de síntomas de acoso psicológico. CSAP-40 Psiquis, 2003;24(1).

  19. Leymann H, Tallgren U. Op cit En: González de Rivera, JL., Rodríguez-Abuín, M. “Cuestionario de estrategias de acoso psicológico: El LIPT-60” Psiquiatría.com, 2003;7(5):2.

  20. Di Martino V, Hoel H, Cooper K. “Preventing violence and harassment in the workplace”. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Ireland, 2003. p.42.

  21. Björkvist K, Österman K, Hjelt-Bäck M. “Aggression among university employees” Aggressive Behavior, Vol. 20, 1994, pp, 173-84. En: Di Martino, V. Helge. Hoel y Cary L. Cooper “Preventing violence and harassment in the workplace”. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Ireland, 2003. p.41.

  22. Piñuel I. “La violencia psicológica en el trabajo” Informe CISNEROS II sobre “Violencia en el entorno laboral” Resultados preliminares del barómetro CISNEROS II. España: 2002. pág 2 (las cursivas son nuestras) http://212.73.52.211/hosting/000c/acosomoral/pdf/bibliografia/PiporcientoF1uel_cisneros2.pdf

  23. MSF (Management, Science and Finance). 1993. Prevention of Violence At Work, and MSF Guide With Model Agreement and Violence At Work Questionnaire. MSF Health and Safety Information, nº 37. Hertz, Unit Kingdom: MSF Health and Safety Office. En: La violencia en el lugar de trabajo. Enciclopedia de Salud y Seguridad en el Trabajo de la Organización Internacional del Trabajo. Cap. 51, pág. 2.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com