medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia

ISSN 2395-9215 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Facultad de Odontología de la UNAM
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Ortodon 2018; 6 (2)

Comparison of bracket irregularities in 4 conventional ligation systems and 1 self-ligating system

Alvarado-Torres E, Cruz-López MF, Gutiérrez-Rojo JF, Rojas-García AR
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 80-82
PDF size: 232.92 Kb.


Key words:

Comparison, brackets, self-ligating, irregularities.

ABSTRACT

Success in the orthodontic movement is directly related to the sliding ability of the arches in the brackets’ and tubes’ slot. The contact between the arch and the slot surface produces friction that is defined as a set of forces that act on the tooth opposing the tooth movement. Objective: To compare bracket and slot irregularities of four conventional ligation systems and one self-ligation system. Material and methods: Using a digital microscope 75 brackets, 15 of each commercial brand, were observed. An image capture was obtained and evaluated by 4 observers who registered the observed irregularities in the base and slot of each bracket, for later percentage comparison. Results: Self-ligating brackets showed the lower percentage of irregularities in the total number of their surfaces as well as in the slot.


REFERENCES

  1. Tamizharasi, Kumar S. Evolution of orthodontic brackets. JIADS. 2012; 1 (30): 25-30.

  2. Almaraz F, Morales C, Medellin R, Guerrero J. Un nuevo aditamento para la conducción de la luz en el procedimiento de bondeado directo. Estudio comparativo in vitro. Ortodon Actual. 2012; 9 (31): 4-9.

  3. Fidalgo TK, Pithon MM, Maciel JV, Bolognese AM. Friction between different wire bracket combinations in artificial saliva- an in vitro evaluation. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011; 19 (1): 57-62.

  4. Cervera-Sabater A, Simón-Pardel M. Fricción en arco recto. Biomecánica básica. Rev Esp Ortod. 2003; 33: 65-72.

  5. Coa P. Fricción en ortodoncia. Rev Evid Odontol Clinic. 2016; 2 (2): 66-78.

  6. Peterson L, Spencer R, Andreasen G. Comparison of friction resistance of nitinol and stainless steel wire in edgewise brackets. Quintessence Int Dent Dig. 1982; 13 (5): 563-571.

  7. Segovia D. Sistemas de brackets de baja fricción en ortodoncia clínica. Facultad de Odontología UNCuyo. 2011; 5 (1): 39-46.

  8. Vicente C. Reconstrucción 3D y análisis de rugosidades mediante estereomicroscopia en aparatología fija. [Tesis doctoral] En cirugía y especialidades médico quirúrgicas. Universidad de Oviedo. 2014.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Ortodon. 2018;6