medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista CONAMED

ISSN 2007-932X (Electronic)
Órgano Oficial de Difusión de la Comisión Nacional de Arbitraje Médico
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number S1

<< Back Next >>

Rev CONAMED 2018; 23 (S1)

Social support networks in the care and caring of bedridden elderly people

Aguilar AY
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 7-12
PDF size: 233.24 Kb.


Key words:

Social support networks, elderly, bedridden people.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Social support networks are resources and barriers in the care of the elderly, becoming more important in those who are dependent as bedridden elderly people. Objective: Analyze the structure and dynamics of social support networks in a group of bedridden elderly people in Mexico City. Material and methods: Qualitative ethnographic study with in-depth interviews and participant observation. Results: The main resources for the elderly come from the family and neighborhood networks, while the formal networks provide regular resources that allow medical attention and economic survival. Conclusions: Through the qualitative analysis of the social support networks, the strengths in care were found, as well as the lag in the care provided by the family and formal networks. In this way, elements are contributed to the discussion on the areas of opportunity on the part of government, family and society institutions.


REFERENCES

  1. Djomba J, Zaletel-Kragelj L. A methodological approach to the analysis of egocentric social networks in public health research: a practical example. Slovenian Journal of Public Health. 2016; 55 (4): 256-263.

  2. Berckman L, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman T. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millenium. Social Science & Medicine. 2000; 51: 843-857.

  3. Montes de Oca V. Redes comunitarias, género y envejecimiento. México: IIS-UNAM; 2005.

  4. Gómez LP, Vila J. Problemática actual del apoyo social y su relación con la salud: Una revisión. Psicología Conductual. 2001; 9: 5-38.

  5. Fernández P. Aprioris para una psicología de la cultura. Athenea Digital. 2005; [Acceso 2018-31-08] 7. Disponible en: http://atheneadigital.net/article/view/178

  6. Cornwell B, Schumm L, Laumann E, Graber J. Social Networks in the NSHAP Study: Rationale Measurement, and preliminary Findings. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences. 2009; 64 B (S1): i47-i55.

  7. Guzmán J, Huenchuan S, Montes de Oca V. Redes de apoyo social de las personas mayores: marco conceptual. Notas de Población. 2002; 77: 35-70.

  8. Hernández A. Informalidad organizacional y redes. Convergencia. 2003; 32: 337-358.

  9. Tantchou M, Joyce M, Chipenda S, Légare F, Witteman H. Diabetes-related complications: Which research topics matter to diverse patients and caregivers? Health Expectations. 2018; 21: 549-559.

  10. Hitomi C, Correia J, Amendola F, Martins M, Campos M. Social network of family caregivers of disabled and dependent patients. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2014; 48: 95.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev CONAMED. 2018;23