medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Medicina Cutánea Ibero-Latino-Americana

ISSN 0210-5187 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Med Cutan Iber Lat Am 2018; 46 (3)

Biologic therapy in psoriasis: experience of seven years in a third level hospital of Ecuador

Cajas GMS, Santamaría NG, De la Torre K, Aguilar K, Cabrera F, Freire P
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 186-190
PDF size: 294.50 Kb.


Key words:

Psoriasis, biological therapy, infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, secukinumab.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by generalized erythematous scaly plaques and manifestations; it can occur at any age and generates a significant physical and emotional impact that affects the quality of life of patients. The management depends on the degree of affectation, which is evaluated through the PASI scale. For cases with moderate, severe or refractory psoriasis, systemic medications are required that have adverse effects and an important relapse rate that limits their use. Biological therapy has revolutionized the management of psoriasis, with better clinical outcomes, as well as fewer relapses. In Ecuador, there are no data on the use of these drugs in psoriasis because of their high cost and difficult access, as well as a lack of long-term follow-up studies. Objective: To determine the epidemiological profile and the percentage of improvement of the patients with moderate-severe psoriasis using biological therapy. Material and methods: Retrospective, observational study with 115 patients diagnosed of psoriasis with PASI ≥ 10, with therapeutic failure of topical, systemic or phototherapy treatments, and who had already been using biological therapy for at least six months, belonging to the Dermatology Department of the Carlos Andrade Marín Hospital from 2010 to 2017. Results: 46.1% of the patients used infliximab, 33.1% etanercept, 19.1% adalimumab and 1.7% secukinumab. 35.7% had a drug change: 20.9% due to therapeutic failure and 14.8% due to lack of availability of the medication. Those who used infliximab had an improvement of 76.4% (± 21.7), etanercept 65.88%, adalimumab 86.2 (± 13.6), and secukinumab 94.1% (± 5.3). Conclusions: Biological therapy achieves a high percentage of improvement in the majority of patients, regardless of the selection of the biological medication—which depended not on the demographic characteristics of the population but on its availability. This selection did not influence the final clinical response, because a PASI ≥ 75 was obtained with all of them.


REFERENCES

  1. Armstrong AW, Harskamp CT, Armstrong EJ. Psoriasis and metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013; 68 (4): 654-662.

  2. Michalek IM, Loring B, John SM. A systematic review of worldwide epidemiology of psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatology Venereol. 2017; 31 (2): 205-212.

  3. Cañarte C. PS. Epidemiología de la Psoriasis en el Hospital Carlos Andrade Marín. Rev Dermatología. 2000; 9 (2): 2-7.

  4. Boehncke WH, Schön MP. Psoriasis. Lancet [Internet]. 2015; 386 (9997): 983-994.

  5. Puig L, Julià A, Marsal S. Psoriasis: bases genéticas y patogenéticas. Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas. 2014; 105 (6): 531-632.

  6. Valdés MP, Schroeder HF, Roizen GV, Honeyman MJ, Sánchez ML. Eficacia y seguimiento en el largo plazo de pacientes con psoriasis vulgar moderada a severa en tratamiento con infliximab (Remicade®). Rev Méd Chile. 2006; 134 (3): 326-331.

  7. Smith CH, Anstey AV, Barker JN, Burden AD, Chalmers RJ, Chandler DA et al. British Association of Dermatologists’ guidelines for biologic interventions for psoriasis 2009. Br J Dermatol. 2009; 161 (5): 987-1019.

  8. Flor-García A, Martínez-Valdivieso L, Menéndez-Ramos F, Barreda-Hernández D, Mejía-Recuero M, Barreira-Hernández D. Actualización en el tratamiento de la psoriasis. Sescam. 2013; 14 (1): 1-8.

  9. Baniandrés O, Rodríguez-Soria VJ, Romero-Jiménez RM, Suárez R. Modificación de la dosis de terapias biológicas en psoriasis moderada-grave: análisis descriptivo en condiciones de práctica clínica. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2015; 106 (7): 569-577.

  10. Menter A, Gottlieb A, Feldman SR, Van Voorhees AS, Leonardi CL, Gordon KB et al. Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Section 1. Overview of psoriasis and guidelines of care for the treatment of psoriasis with biologics. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008; 58 (5): 826-850.

  11. Prey S, Paul C, Bronsard V, Puzenat E, Gourraud PA, Aractingi S et al. Assessment of risk of psoriatic arthritis in patients with plaque psoriasis: a systematic review of the literature. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2010; 24 Suppl 2: 31-35.

  12. Ni C, Chiu MW. Psoriasis and comorbidities: links and risks. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2014; 7: 119-132.

  13. Espinoza-Hernández CJ, Lacy-Niebla R, Soto-López M, Kesch-Tronik N, Vega-Memije M. Prevalencia del síndrome metabólico (SM) en pacientes con psoriasis. Gac Med Mex. 2014; 150 (4): 311-316.

  14. Consejo Nacional de Salud y Comisión Nacional de Medicamentos e Insumos. MSP. Cuadro Nacional de Medicamentos Básicos y Registro Terapéutico.

  15. Sánchez-Regaña M, Dilmé E, Puig L, Bordas X, Carrascosa JM, Ferran M et al. Efectos adversos observados durante la terapia biológica en la psoriasis. Resultados de una encuesta al Grupo Español de Psoriasis. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2010; 101: 156-163.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Med Cutan Iber Lat Am. 2018;46